Cherry picking convenient data proves nothingNathanOlder wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 09:57SO Ricciardo having MORE mechanical issues in the 2017 and 2018 seasons (the 2 full seasons they were team mates) makes Max better than Ricciardo somehow. Focusing on points is not bias, its one of a better way to gauge things.Andres125sx wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 08:2820-14 was the total result of race days when both teammates finished the race, for Max. Focusing on points is bias, there was around 15DNF each season in RBR, points are a matter of who´s lucky to finish his better races and retire on those wich didn´t go great, or the other way aroundNathanOlder wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 03:09
I'm not taking anything away from Max, just pointing out from the day Max stepped in, to the Day Danny announced his departure, Danny scored more points every year.
But people say Max ripped danny apart.
Points are everything, and Danny was better the whole time he was 'in' the team and not an outsider. (not blaming RedBull, every team does the same)
20-14 considering Max was a teenager and Ricciardo had loads more experience both in F1 and with that particular car is amazing, and I´ll repeat I´m a big Ricciardo fan, but reality is what it is.
People say Max ripped Danny apart because people enjoy exaggerating, but they have a very solid base to say that
What makes Max better is the stated 20-14 against Ricciardo when ignoring mechanical failures. Mechanical failures means nothing about drivers talent