dxpetrov wrote: ↑21 Nov 2019, 12:56
Just_a_fan wrote: ↑21 Nov 2019, 11:14
Wass85 wrote: ↑21 Nov 2019, 09:13
Max did too, like I said earlier I bet Max was ahead of Dan more often than the other way around when their cars retired.
Ric had more than twice the number of retirements than Max. Ric also had a good number of races where he had grid penalties, started well down the grid, and still finished immediately behind Max. So he raced through the midfield and got up behind Max.
Not really. Most retirements happened whilst he was behind Max.
He was nowhere in race trim compared to Max. Go and check race by race.
I have done, thanks, which is why I said what I said. A lot of his problems occurred before/during qualifying - he had plenty of grid penalties that messed his weekend from the start. Even when starting from many places back, he often finished immediately behind Max. On a number of occasions in qualifying, the two were separated by only a few thousandths of a second meaning they were as good as each other.
It's notable how many retirements Ric had after Canada. Ric had 8 retirements in the season compared to Max's three - both had 2 before Canada. When his car held together, Ric always finished top 6, Max had a 9th and a 15th.
Ric had two poles where Max had none. Ric had pole at Monaco - a circuit that requires skill and commitment I'm sure you'll agree - whilst Max had crashed in FP3 and so couldn't run. Ric also had one of his retirements after getting pole. Max won that race. Afterwards, Ric said his car was cursed and couldn't see the point in doing the rest of the season. His team let him down and he basically gave up. Max got all the good support, Ric got none. Few drivers can thrive in that environment.
The reality is the Max did not blow Ric out of the water as some claim. They were very close when both cars held together.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.