Since the average driver logs 13,476 miles each year, that means that in total, Americans drive more than 2.5 trillion miles annually.
Since the average driver logs 13,476 miles each year, that means that in total, Americans drive more than 2.5 trillion miles annually.
Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑27 Nov 2019, 21:32
and ...
FW17's figure of 160W-hr/km - up to what speed does that apply to electric cars ? (even with matching power capability)
So an average of 37miles / 60km a day
I'd say that number seems about right. But I think people wonder about those three or four times a year when they want to go to grandma's house 300 miles away. I believe people worry about the unforeseen and unknown.So an average of 37miles / 60km a day
Agree, but at least in my case the main factor stopping me from going electric is purchase price, way too highstrad wrote: ↑28 Nov 2019, 20:24I'd say that number seems about right. But I think people wonder about those three or four times a year when they want to go to grandma's house 300 miles away. I believe people worry about the unforeseen and unknown.So an average of 37miles / 60km a day
IF somehow they got put in one for a few months most would be won over, IF it was easily and cheaply recharged.
An EV would be perfect for my use case, I drive 40km's round trip to work and home each day and maybe a couple of 100-150km round trips on the weekend. The only thing that stopped me from buying one earlier this year was the price. I did the TCO numbers and they just didn't add up for me (which sucked as I'd love one). We have a 2 car garage so charging one at home each night would be a non-issue.strad wrote: ↑28 Nov 2019, 20:24I'd say that number seems about right. But I think people wonder about those three or four times a year when they want to go to grandma's house 300 miles away. I believe people worry about the unforeseen and unknown.
IF somehow they got put in one for a few months most would be won over, IF it was easily and cheaply recharged.
I just used the w/m number that was being used in the conversation previously, my bad for not fact checking that =)Andres125sx wrote: ↑28 Nov 2019, 08:58So that maths some were calculating on previous page with 100kWh a day charges were much more than simply absurd, 15kWh will be more accurate, reducing those demands with a 6x-7x factor
I think looking at only the increase in electricity demands without looking at the decrease in the demand due to elimating the ICE engines doesn't show the whole picture. Its been estimated that 1 US Gal of petrol takes 8.4kWh to manufacture and transport ("well to tank"). Of course there are going to be lots of opinions on what the actual value is. I used 22 MPG based on a 2017 study of average fuel economy of 264million US cars.Brake Horse Power wrote: ↑29 Nov 2019, 22:50There are estimated to be around a billion cars in the world, if we take let's say 35mile a day average which is in line I think with US average that's 35 billion mile or 56billion km a day or 20.440 billion km per year. An average BEV consumes 20kWh / 100km, infrastructure efficiency 75% makes 0,266 kWh /km.
Totals
5.449.304.000.000 kWh
5.449.304.000 MWh
5.449.304 GWh
5.449 TWh
Coal powered electricity generation topped 10.100 TWh last year. It will probably decline 300 TWh this year
So that also throws the 'energy cost', both the demands and removals, into muddy waters. They are also a bit more pessimistic in their outlook... ICE engines still making up 75% of the automobile mix in 2050.Energy use per passenger-mile of travel in light-duty vehicles declines nearly 40% between 2018 and
2050 as newer, more fuel-efficient vehicles enter the market, including both more efficient conventional
gasoline vehicles and highly efficient alternatives such as battery electric vehicles. Light-duty vehicle
energy efficiencies are affected by current federal fuel economy and greenhouse gas emission standards.
Great document thanks a lotsubcritical71 wrote: ↑16 Jan 2020, 17:03The EIA (https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/aeo2019.pdf) has also already taken the conversion to EV into account in their long term forecasts and says this ...
Do you have a link to that analysis?Greg Locock wrote: ↑17 Jan 2020, 00:16Somebody worked out that if Victoria, Australia, went fully EV we'd need an additional 10 GW 24h a day to charge them. That's several large power stations, or if you prefer, 60 kW of solar panels per household, ie 12 times the typical installation. +storage+it won't work in winter.