He also said if it’s true then it’s pretty much a black and white DQ. If it’s true and confirmed then why is he allowed to start?
He also said if it’s true then it’s pretty much a black and white DQ. If it’s true and confirmed then why is he allowed to start?
Why after the race? why not now before the race?MtthsMlw wrote: ↑01 Dec 2019, 14:44Could just be a miscommunication somewhere. Running your car underweight isn't clever these days.Capharol wrote: ↑01 Dec 2019, 14:40yes Bauer found out that the amount of fuel in the car was different as what the team said.NathanOlder wrote: ↑01 Dec 2019, 14:37Ferrari Leclerc under investigation already
Didn't quite hear it, but some thing along the lines of amoubt of fuel onboard
it will be investigated AFTER the race
Maybe he had like 10kg and some guy at Ferrari made a typing error and wrote 100kg
because they wanna hear the teams statement, which can't be done so shortly before the raceRestomaniac wrote: ↑01 Dec 2019, 14:55He also said if it’s true then it’s pretty much a black and white DQ. If it’s true and confirmed then why is he allowed to start?
There was a huge aero upgrade from ferrari at singaporeMtthsMlw wrote: ↑01 Dec 2019, 14:29If it just was as easy as pile on DF and go fast in the corners.siskue2005 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2019, 13:33Yup, the Ferrari has been fastest on the straight from day 1, it is nothing new...In the singapore they were able to pile downforce and go faster than the almighty cornering speeds of Merc and still be more than 3 tenths faster in straight and also faster in cornersdjones wrote: ↑01 Dec 2019, 12:26
This is missing the point completely.
The Ferrari design has been low downforce and high top speed from day one of the season.
The engine trick that now seems to have gone since the clarifications allowed them to run more downforce but still be fast on the straights. Now they do not have that we will again see slow cornering and higher tyre wear.
Expect to see the closest Ferrari at minimum 30 seconds behind the leader come the flag.
[..]
Do you see them running Monza wings here in Abu Dhabi? No, it's the same standard RW as usual - comparison.
Any other way of saying "they took off DF" is based on nothing we can validate for sure.
Hungary, Monaco, Barcelona S3 all very high DF but Ferrari still losing out in corners. This problem wasn't fully solved with the Singapore upgrade, it helped but Merc and RB were also not performing at their best.
Different asphalt, air temp, track temp, tyre pressures, corner radii, curbs etc. can not be ignored.
Some car performes well at track X and is suddenly bad at track Y that's just how it goes.
Last year Ferrari also lost 6 tenths in S3 and in 2017 it wasn't much different.
You can also see on Vettels steering wheel that all of his tyres start overheating right after the hairpin which ofc doesn't help in S3.
If anything this year and its tyres showed is that you want as much DF as you can get, doesn't matter if you lose 3 tenths on the straights in Qualifying.
fueling heavy or light won't break a rule though.Webber2011 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2019, 15:08So what do you think they have done guys ?
Fueled over the declaration so they don't have to save, or gone under to be lighter ?
Which one would make the most sense ?
If they have got it wrong it’s wrong. It doesn’t matter what statement Ferrari have it’s black and white.Capharol wrote: ↑01 Dec 2019, 14:58because they wanna hear the teams statement, which can't be done so shortly before the raceRestomaniac wrote: ↑01 Dec 2019, 14:55He also said if it’s true then it’s pretty much a black and white DQ. If it’s true and confirmed then why is he allowed to start?
I thought Horner said it breaks a technical regulation if you don't stick to what you declare, thus leading to disqualification ?NathanOlder wrote: ↑01 Dec 2019, 15:09fueling heavy or light won't break a rule though.Webber2011 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2019, 15:08So what do you think they have done guys ?
Fueled over the declaration so they don't have to save, or gone under to be lighter ?
Which one would make the most sense ?