izzy wrote: ↑20 Jan 2020, 21:41
Mudflap wrote: ↑20 Jan 2020, 05:02
Regarding graphene nanofluids:
The Honda F1 paper has a chapter called 'Research on coolant using nano additives and heavy water'. Their finding was that for the coolant flow velocities required in F1 the pumping losses were too high to justify the increase in overall heat transfer coefficient.
While Honda have only tested carbon nanotubes and aluminium oxides, the few papers available online seem to suggest the same drawbacks for graphene additives. As a reference, for 2 to 5°C reduction in cylinder head temperature the engine output had dropped by 4 to 8 kW due to the high coolant viscosity.
My prediction is that we won't be hearing of flexegraph in F1 anytime soon.
oh interesting. Tho at the same time it's hard to imagine F1 still can't find anything better than water and glycol
Like I mentioned they could get a benefit by coating the radiators with graphine.
Here is a consumer products example.
Air cooler for a cpu, 115W TDP
http://www.cryorig.com/c7cu.php
Same cooler with a graphine coating has a 125W TDP
http://www.cryorig.com/c7g.php
Though for an F1 cooling system I don't think you will see that kind of performance gain.