True... but I thought they usually did this at Fiorano, I would have thought they’d be on the way to Barcelona by now
7 of the cleverest deceptions in F1 testing history
The clever people would do a qualifying simulation in testing with just that little bit extra fuel, say around 10 kgs, which is worth about 0.3s,” he says. “And that's where you’d get that sort of, ‘Were they or weren't they?’
i'm expecting live timing to be working. And hoping Sky and various people are going to be giving us some stintsNathanOlder wrote: ↑16 Feb 2020, 23:58Am I right in thinking the live timing for the tests will be the usual F1 app timing? So glad when they announced the live timing. Will make it a lot more interesting, Especially if the timing app records each drivers best sector like it does at a normal race weekend.
I agree with you, nevertheless from a Aero perspective, knowing that you will be getting the same engine and suspension components and with most of the Aero been easy to analyze during the year, you would expect them to follow what worked for the previous car... I’m not saying that’s the case and I don’t know how easy it is at the end of the day, but it will be interesting to see if that translates into a huge leap in lap times for those teams.Just_a_fan wrote:The teams can only buy in a selected list of components. Obviously the nature of the PUs means that entire drivetrains are included. But sidepod shapes and other aero-critical components aren't. So the aero ability of last year's RBR and Ferrari shouldn't be a simple bolt on for Haas etc. They need to do their own bodywork, wings etc., and that affects performance - if it didn't , the top three wouldn't have been constantly evolving theirs.
Morteza wrote: ↑14 Feb 2020, 20:47Confirmed testing line-ups so far
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ERC9U3mWAAAjnXN.png:large
I think it was more out of necessity because the amount of laps they could do each dayPlatinumZealot wrote: ↑18 Feb 2020, 14:45I like Mercedes way of doing it. They would put both drivers on each day.