As these are notes he's made based on his feeling in the car, it would not be him writing that the tyres were overheating, would it? That would be the job of the engineers having insight into data.
Conditions aside, they will be running very slow, testing the car, without an optimal setup and without optimal tyres.Wass85 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2020, 13:11Not if conditions are much faster than they were in qualifying last season.LM10 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2020, 13:08Of course you can. If in day 1 of testing a car is already faster than in their party mode in qualifying last year, you can tell for sure that they've improved massively.
It's not a surprise Racing Point W10 is much faster than Racing Point RP19, but it's nice to see the Williams being significantly faster (6 tenths) than it's predecessor in qualifying last year.
If the drivers were of equal quality (they are not, unfortunately) then I don't think it would be too far fetched. In the final races after the rule clarifications on the fuel sensor, look how far behind Ferrari were in races, it was considerable.
I doubt it, especially if Mercedes didn't give them the specs. Racing Point needs to design their own suspension, cooling, need to understand the setup and develop the aero during the year. All of this is quite hard to do if you don't know everything you need to know about the aero you are running.
In that case it will be a fun year . I expect a lot of complaining from some teams.bosyber wrote: ↑19 Feb 2020, 15:42Racing point did use the 2019 Merc. suspension and gearbox - see AMuS article about their car (today I think), but that article also mentions they did not just copy, they had to understand the concept, which reads to me as they got to see Merc.'s homework and ponder it.