jein,
it's like watching ski racing - they can look smooth because they're fast, or edgy because they're... on the edge! Or smooth because they're not really near the limit, or edgy because it's not working!JPBD1990 wrote: ↑27 Feb 2020, 12:47I love that the ‘experts’ observing trackside have been consistently saying the redbull looks GREAT! Better than the Mercedes!
Now they’ve spun 5 times (?) they’re looking ‘a bit edgy’. Haha.
Love these experts. Ties into what George said yesterday - trackside observations are garbage.
How do we think they get these numbers? I didn't think GPS data was available or that live timing had sufficient resolutionPolite wrote: ↑27 Feb 2020, 00:14from Formulapassion.it
https://www.formulapassion.it/wp-conten ... ering1.jpg
https://www.formulapassion.it/wp-conten ... ering2.jpg
I thought the app was reliable for speeds. Accleration at the top end slows down significantly, so the sampling rate on the app should be fine for capturing top speeds. That's assuming the cars are actually geared for this track, and not for a much longer straight like Baku.AshSIreland wrote: ↑27 Feb 2020, 12:58How do we think they get these numbers? I didn't think GPS data was available or that live timing had sufficient resolutionPolite wrote: ↑27 Feb 2020, 00:14from Formulapassion.it
https://www.formulapassion.it/wp-conten ... ering1.jpg
https://www.formulapassion.it/wp-conten ... ering2.jpg
top speeds during cornering are less dependent on power installed.. only those after a long strait can be fake because of the power mode of the PU (like turn 1.. and turn 10, where Ferrari is slow maybe because the car comes with lower max speed and the braking zone is part of the turn)pimpwerx wrote: ↑27 Feb 2020, 13:11I thought the app was reliable for speeds. Accleration at the top end slows down significantly, so the sampling rate on the app should be fine for capturing top speeds. That's assuming the cars are actually geared for this track, and not for a much longer straight like Baku.AshSIreland wrote: ↑27 Feb 2020, 12:58How do we think they get these numbers? I didn't think GPS data was available or that live timing had sufficient resolutionPolite wrote: ↑27 Feb 2020, 00:14from Formulapassion.it
https://www.formulapassion.it/wp-conten ... ering1.jpg
https://www.formulapassion.it/wp-conten ... ering2.jpg
That said, we don't know engine modes, so fairly useless.
I'll give myself a big, "duh" on that. I wasn't even thinking about the apex speeds. My bad. You're totally right.Polite wrote: ↑27 Feb 2020, 13:16top speeds during cornering are less dependent on power installed.. only those after a long strait can be fake because of the power mode of the PU (like turn 1.. and turn 10, where Ferrari is slow maybe because the car comes with lower max speed and the braking zone is part of the turn)pimpwerx wrote: ↑27 Feb 2020, 13:11I thought the app was reliable for speeds. Accleration at the top end slows down significantly, so the sampling rate on the app should be fine for capturing top speeds. That's assuming the cars are actually geared for this track, and not for a much longer straight like Baku.
That said, we don't know engine modes, so fairly useless.