OT: I posted my very own tinfoil hat theory on the Hungarian GP thread. It just happens that Kimi's inlap + outlap is like 3 to 4 seconds faster than the next best, including Massa, Lewis, Heikki and himself (I have to find out the exact gap). My guess is that it has nothing to do with the fuel rig and a lot to do with having a broken transponder. There has to be a reason why Kimi's second pitlane excursion wasnt timed.Ciro Pabón wrote: ... but no discussions about Alonso's complains on Ferrari's fuel rig, which means that the fuel thingie gives so many advantages to some teams that the chances of pitstops elliminated are something between zero and 0, nil and null or nothing and none.
On page 8, no threads yet about this (that I know):
And back to topic: I think banning refueling will help nobody. But I also think that using two tire compounds in one race mean using a compromise set up and a compromise tire in an otherwise no-comprimise world and, as such, a silly rule. My impression is that we should see how the new aero rules work before changing a system that has produced some great races and seasons. After all, if the pole position really reflects race pace (which it mostly does in a parc ferme setting), no overtakings should happen. Yes, I think parc-fermé plus no warm-up on sunday is detrimental to racing.
