I can't defend them, but at this point the regulations severely hamstring a team's ability to react to a mistake in the development process.dfegan358 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2020, 14:17Very poor performance from Ferrari today. Considering their resources and financial clout, it is disappointing how they have performed this year.
Clearly the engine is at the bottom of the pack now. The technical department need to get things together at Maranello.
Seb is probably not too disappointed to be leaving as he has better Chance of wins/podiums at Aston Martin if he ends up there.
True, but they knew that the car needed a lot to be done and they agreed to freeze the chassis components and the introduction of the 2 tokens available for this and the following year.dtro wrote: ↑28 Aug 2020, 17:10I can't defend them, but at this point the regulations severely hamstring a team's ability to react to a mistake in the development process.dfegan358 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2020, 14:17Very poor performance from Ferrari today. Considering their resources and financial clout, it is disappointing how they have performed this year.
Clearly the engine is at the bottom of the pack now. The technical department need to get things together at Maranello.
Seb is probably not too disappointed to be leaving as he has better Chance of wins/podiums at Aston Martin if he ends up there.
I don't know what they need to read, or misread to succeed again. Given their success was based off of at best an exploitation of a loophole and at worst outright cheating that required a settlement with the FIA or somewhere in between- their lack of pace is obscene. Two years of this will be rough on the Tifosi.Xwang wrote: ↑28 Aug 2020, 17:32True, but they knew that the car needed a lot to be done and they agreed to freeze the chassis components and the introduction of the 2 tokens available for this and the following year.dtro wrote: ↑28 Aug 2020, 17:10I can't defend them, but at this point the regulations severely hamstring a team's ability to react to a mistake in the development process.dfegan358 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2020, 14:17Very poor performance from Ferrari today. Considering their resources and financial clout, it is disappointing how they have performed this year.
Clearly the engine is at the bottom of the pack now. The technical department need to get things together at Maranello.
Seb is probably not too disappointed to be leaving as he has better Chance of wins/podiums at Aston Martin if he ends up there.
I wonder if someone in Ferrari has ever read "The art of war" by Sun Tzu, maybe they will discover that in a competitive environment like F1 they should only think about their team interests and not about if other teams will survive or not.
On the other hand it is also possible that they agreed to limit development so that to have an excuse for them not being able to design and develop a decent car.
Xwang wrote: ↑28 Aug 2020, 17:32
True, but they knew that the car needed a lot to be done and they agreed to freeze the chassis components and the introduction of the 2 tokens available for this and the following year.
I wonder if someone in Ferrari has ever read "The art of war" by Sun Tzu, maybe they will discover that in a competitive environment like F1 they should only think about their team interests and not about if other teams will survive or not.
On the other hand it is also possible that they agreed to limit development so that to have an excuse for them not being able to design and develop a decent car.
Obscene is a good word for this tragedy. There is no way a team as large and as well funded as Ferrari should be producing a car this bad.dtro wrote: ↑28 Aug 2020, 23:08I don't know what they need to read, or misread to succeed again. Given their success was based off of at best an exploitation of a loophole and at worst outright cheating that required a settlement with the FIA or somewhere in between- their lack of pace is obscene. Two years of this will be rough on the Tifosi.Xwang wrote: ↑28 Aug 2020, 17:32True, but they knew that the car needed a lot to be done and they agreed to freeze the chassis components and the introduction of the 2 tokens available for this and the following year.
I wonder if someone in Ferrari has ever read "The art of war" by Sun Tzu, maybe they will discover that in a competitive environment like F1 they should only think about their team interests and not about if other teams will survive or not.
On the other hand it is also possible that they agreed to limit development so that to have an excuse for them not being able to design and develop a decent car.
Given Covid-19 I'm not surprised they didn't have much leverage in such negotiations when it comes to attempting to save this season and the next.
I also think and hope so. I guess that's why Binotto told that this and next season are gonna be kind of hard for us all, in an attempt to prepare the people.Ringleheim wrote: ↑29 Aug 2020, 07:30Obscene is a good word for this tragedy. There is no way a team as large and as well funded as Ferrari should be producing a car this bad.dtro wrote: ↑28 Aug 2020, 23:08I don't know what they need to read, or misread to succeed again. Given their success was based off of at best an exploitation of a loophole and at worst outright cheating that required a settlement with the FIA or somewhere in between- their lack of pace is obscene. Two years of this will be rough on the Tifosi.Xwang wrote: ↑28 Aug 2020, 17:32
True, but they knew that the car needed a lot to be done and they agreed to freeze the chassis components and the introduction of the 2 tokens available for this and the following year.
I wonder if someone in Ferrari has ever read "The art of war" by Sun Tzu, maybe they will discover that in a competitive environment like F1 they should only think about their team interests and not about if other teams will survive or not.
On the other hand it is also possible that they agreed to limit development so that to have an excuse for them not being able to design and develop a decent car.
Given Covid-19 I'm not surprised they didn't have much leverage in such negotiations when it comes to attempting to save this season and the next.
I'm pretty sure most if not all development on this year's car--and next year's car--is already canned in an effort to get the new reg car correct out of the gate.
As a big time Ferrari fan, I sure hope that is the plan.
They cannot develop the 2022 car until 2021 starts.LM10 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2020, 08:37I also think and hope so. I guess that's why Binotto told that this and next season are gonna be kind of hard for us all, in an attempt to prepare the people.Ringleheim wrote: ↑29 Aug 2020, 07:30Obscene is a good word for this tragedy. There is no way a team as large and as well funded as Ferrari should be producing a car this bad.dtro wrote: ↑28 Aug 2020, 23:08
I don't know what they need to read, or misread to succeed again. Given their success was based off of at best an exploitation of a loophole and at worst outright cheating that required a settlement with the FIA or somewhere in between- their lack of pace is obscene. Two years of this will be rough on the Tifosi.
Given Covid-19 I'm not surprised they didn't have much leverage in such negotiations when it comes to attempting to save this season and the next.
I'm pretty sure most if not all development on this year's car--and next year's car--is already canned in an effort to get the new reg car correct out of the gate.
As a big time Ferrari fan, I sure hope that is the plan.
More relevant in the team thread, but Ferrari has been walking down that road for years. They’ve been replacing person after person for years, which is exactly what has lead us here. It’s worked so well up to this point, I’m glad to see people are STILL rationally requesting this... again.bruno958 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2020, 13:40They are actually going backwards. Binotto promised a better Saturday yesterday, something about tire temperatures. At what point can we clearly state that the team is incompetent in the basic principles of aerodynamic/traction and that new personnel is required for improvement?
I get that constantly chopping and changing solves nothing, but honestly is Binotto REALLY the right man to be leading the team? Look at the successful team principals past and present. They are not engineers being asked to be managers like him. They are managers, leaders and motivators who know enough about engineering to manage teams of engineers or 'specialists'. From my basic understanding of management and personality types, usually the type of person who is a brilliant engineer or a so called specialist is not the sort of personality type who is equipped to lead a huge group of people effectively. I won't go into all the whys and wherefores, but I am sure there are plenty or articles and studies on line which can be easily read.JPBD1990 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2020, 13:43More relevant in the team thread, but Ferrari has been walking down that road for years. They’ve been replacing person after person for years, which is exactly what has lead us here. It’s worked so well up to this point, I’m glad to see people are STILL rationally requesting this... again.bruno958 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2020, 13:40They are actually going backwards. Binotto promised a better Saturday yesterday, something about tire temperatures. At what point can we clearly state that the team is incompetent in the basic principles of aerodynamic/traction and that new personnel is required for improvement?
I know, let’s fire everyone and burn down maranello, and start from the ground up. I’ll see you in 2055 for their next chance of winning.