I don't know how the races will turn out to be but the concept is imho brillant yet simple! i love the designs a freedom.
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/news ... nship.html
I think they are around 15mm depending on fuel IIRCScotracer wrote:20mm restrictor is tiny!
My Formula Student car is running a 38mm restrictor (IIRC) and that's on a 0.55 litre engine...seriously, a 20mm restrictor will reduce possible mass flow rate to virtually nothing!
If you have a 38mm restrictor you won't be getting through tech. 20mm, 19mm for E85.Scotracer wrote:20mm restrictor is tiny!
My Formula Student car is running a 38mm restrictor (IIRC) and that's on a 0.55 litre engine...seriously, a 20mm restrictor will reduce possible mass flow rate to virtually nothing!
I was thinking of a different series I was looking at...and confusing it with the standard TB of the engine.Jersey Tom wrote:If you have a 38mm restrictor you won't be getting through tech. 20mm, 19mm for E85.Scotracer wrote:20mm restrictor is tiny!
My Formula Student car is running a 38mm restrictor (IIRC) and that's on a 0.55 litre engine...seriously, a 20mm restrictor will reduce possible mass flow rate to virtually nothing!
WRC is 34mm...
So this F20 series should have about 80 horse or so... basically a heavy FSAE series. Hopefully built a little better.
Based on what data? There is a limit to the amount of air mass that you can pull through any sized orifice when it achieves choked flow at Mach 1. Since generally power is a function of mass flow, there is a hard limit to power you can generate.Conceptual wrote:I think that with some work, you could get 140hp from a 20mm restrictor...
The cold output side of a medium sized vortex tube is 20mm, so I just figured that you could use a turbo charger to pressurize the tube, and shoot -30C air into the engine. I understand your math, but it the air was much colder, and more dense, wouldn't it produce more power? And since the work to compress the charge is directly related to the temperature of the charge, you may lose some parasitic loss that way as well.Jersey Tom wrote:Based on what data? There is a limit to the amount of air mass that you can pull through any sized orifice when it achieves choked flow at Mach 1. Since generally power is a function of mass flow, there is a hard limit to power you can generate.Conceptual wrote:I think that with some work, you could get 140hp from a 20mm restrictor...
It's been a while since I've run the numbers, and I was only a junior at the time, but I believe when I worked it out... the maximum isentropic flow rate possible through a 20mm restrictor would have been good for about 80-85hp or so.
There are FSAE teams that claim to be well into the 100+ hp range, though obviously you can generate just about whatever number you want off a dyno based on the corrections... and it's possible I didn't work it out right.
Vortex tube? Could you explain a bit further? With what power would you compress your air?Conceptual wrote:The cold output side of a medium sized vortex tube is 20mm, so I just figured that you could use a turbo charger to pressurize the tube, and shoot -30C air into the engine. I understand your math, but it the air was much colder, and more dense, wouldn't it produce more power? And since the work to compress the charge is directly related to the temperature of the charge, you may lose some parasitic loss that way as well.Jersey Tom wrote:Based on what data? There is a limit to the amount of air mass that you can pull through any sized orifice when it achieves choked flow at Mach 1. Since generally power is a function of mass flow, there is a hard limit to power you can generate.Conceptual wrote:I think that with some work, you could get 140hp from a 20mm restrictor...
It's been a while since I've run the numbers, and I was only a junior at the time, but I believe when I worked it out... the maximum isentropic flow rate possible through a 20mm restrictor would have been good for about 80-85hp or so.
There are FSAE teams that claim to be well into the 100+ hp range, though obviously you can generate just about whatever number you want off a dyno based on the corrections... and it's possible I didn't work it out right.
I would look at the 650CC Freedom Rotary motor. It produces 75hp stock, and has a 3/4 inch air intake. Hooking the turbo/vortex tube to that should be a quick way to determine if it is a workable proposition.
Actually, I may email them to ask if they will try it themselves...