There are two ways of achieving reliability. Build things strong enough such that the occasional departures above the normal load regime can be tolerated or build things such that the departures from the norm are less frequent. I wonder if Mercedes strength lies in the latter. A much more consistent combustion process from rev to rev and across cylinders. That form of reliability is more difficult to chase than the other.Mudflap wrote: ↑02 Sep 2020, 18:09[
My opinion is that all manufacturers can achieve very similar peak power figures, however the main difference is in how long the engine can run for in those conditions without the risk of failure. As such any so called reliability update is inherently a performance update. This was not a problem before when engine development was unlimited - it only became an issue when the restrictions were implemented on quite a short notice. In this case the TD related to qualy modes is a patch aimed at closing a loophole created by the newly introduced regulations restricting the PU development.
Unfortunately I don't believe this recent modes ban fully addresses the issue since there are still opportunities for teams to run the engine beyond its durability envelope. In my view FIA should ask manufacturers to provide histograms of cylinder pressure, engine speed and coolant temperature for the duty cycles used to validate engine durability on the dyno. PU usage at the track should then be monitored and not allowed to exceed the "homologated" duty cycle.
Same, but my understanding is that they CAN use the highest engine mode in qualifying if they want but then they would have to use it in the race too under the new rules, and most likely the engine would fail due to the stresses upon it- so because of that, they would now choose not to use it in qualifying.
But they use various engine modes throughout the race so how can they govern it?El Scorchio wrote: ↑03 Sep 2020, 10:38Same, but my understanding is that they CAN use the highest engine mode in qualifying if they want but then they would have to use it in the race too under the new rules, and most likely the engine would fail due to the stresses upon it- so because of that, they would now choose not to use it in qualifying.
A proper rules expert can no doubt correct me!
that is correct, or at least, that is how I also understand it. And you may actually go to a lower engine mode during the race, but only once (you can never go back to the higher mode) and only if there is a legitimate reason (a real engine problem, that needs to be defendable).El Scorchio wrote: ↑03 Sep 2020, 10:38Same, but my understanding is that they CAN use the highest engine mode in qualifying if they want but then they would have to use it in the race too under the new rules, and most likely the engine would fail due to the stresses upon it- so because of that, they would now choose not to use it in qualifying.
A proper rules expert can no doubt correct me!
No idea really. I guess it's for the rulemakers to try and keep track of it. I am positive all the teams will come up with clever tricks and workarounds to maximise what they could still do within the new rules. Would be very interesting if for example Renault finds a clever (legal) trick first which really helps them. Could turn things a bit upside down.Wass85 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2020, 10:42But they use various engine modes throughout the race so how can they govern it?El Scorchio wrote: ↑03 Sep 2020, 10:38Same, but my understanding is that they CAN use the highest engine mode in qualifying if they want but then they would have to use it in the race too under the new rules, and most likely the engine would fail due to the stresses upon it- so because of that, they would now choose not to use it in qualifying.
A proper rules expert can no doubt correct me!
Surely all a team needs to do is run the highest strat at some point in the race and they're covered?
That seems like a real handicap actually, so if you have a problem where you need to turn the engine down a bit, then you might as well just retire the car if you never have the option of switching back because you're only going to go backwards. So maybe we'll see more non-spectactular engine based retirements? Or more spectacular ones if they won't turn it down for fear of not being able to turn it back up....Sieper wrote: ↑03 Sep 2020, 10:44that is correct, or at least, that is how I also understand it. And you may actually go to a lower engine mode during the race, but only once (you can never go back to the higher mode) and only if there is a legitimate reason (a real engine problem, that needs to be defendable).El Scorchio wrote: ↑03 Sep 2020, 10:38Same, but my understanding is that they CAN use the highest engine mode in qualifying if they want but then they would have to use it in the race too under the new rules, and most likely the engine would fail due to the stresses upon it- so because of that, they would now choose not to use it in qualifying.
A proper rules expert can no doubt correct me!
In fact that leaves questions open. but OK. we have not had much detail around this communicated. In fact, I still am not 100% sure it will be in effect this weekend.
Yes, I think that is correct.djones wrote: ↑03 Sep 2020, 11:33I'm so confused. Is this correct......
Teams currently have for example 10 engine modes.
In qualifying and parts of the race, they currently use the most powerful (less reliable) mode.
In the new rules whatever the engine mode setting you run in qualifying is then the exact mode you have to use for the entire race, with the exception of certain conditions such as safety car etc.
And you can turn it down in the race, but never back up.
??