stick to the threads topic please.
It's quite clear Hamilton is now going to break Schumacher's records, what more is there to say?
I think it's a little bit of both. Schumacher probably couldn't adapt to that generation of cars and tires as quickly, and then he got paired with a strong team mate. The cars and tires at that time probably drove very differently to how Schumacher's cars did.NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:51If he was sandbagging, it cost him a seat in a team that has dominated the sport like no other. In reality, there's no way he would sandbag though. He just didnt have it anymore and/or Rosberg was actually a very good driver.e30ernest wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:32Yeah I agree with this. Schumacher at that point was not a match for Rosberg. Based on the points tally I did last time, Rosberg would have gotten 2014-2016. This is unless Schumacher was sandbagging because the car was not competitive, but I do think he was giving it full beans against Rosberg.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:06
If Michael had stayed instead of retiring a second time, Rosberg would be a multiple champion. People forget that Rosberg beat Schumacher 3 - 0 in their time together at Mercedes.
It was quite evident he didn't have it anymore, the occasional show of brilliance wasn't enough to overcome his obvious shortfalls.NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:51If he was sandbagging, it cost him a seat in a team that has dominated the sport like no other. In reality, there's no way he would sandbag though. He just didnt have it anymore and/or Rosberg was actually a very good driver.e30ernest wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:32Yeah I agree with this. Schumacher at that point was not a match for Rosberg. Based on the points tally I did last time, Rosberg would have gotten 2014-2016. This is unless Schumacher was sandbagging because the car was not competitive, but I do think he was giving it full beans against Rosberg.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:06
If Michael had stayed instead of retiring a second time, Rosberg would be a multiple champion. People forget that Rosberg beat Schumacher 3 - 0 in their time together at Mercedes.
Quite possible as I'm sure that he was closer in pace to Rosberg in 2012 than he was at any point of their partnership.e30ernest wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:55I think it's a little bit of both. Schumacher probably couldn't adapt to that generation of cars and tires as quickly, and then he got paired with a strong team mate. The cars and tires at that time probably drove very differently to how Schumacher's cars did.NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:51If he was sandbagging, it cost him a seat in a team that has dominated the sport like no other. In reality, there's no way he would sandbag though. He just didnt have it anymore and/or Rosberg was actually a very good driver.e30ernest wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:32
Yeah I agree with this. Schumacher at that point was not a match for Rosberg. Based on the points tally I did last time, Rosberg would have gotten 2014-2016. This is unless Schumacher was sandbagging because the car was not competitive, but I do think he was giving it full beans against Rosberg.
Yeah thats true, the older you are I guess the slower you become at reacting and fine tuning these changes. Be interesting to see how a 37yr old Hamilton adapts to the 2022 rule changes compared to the likes of Max, Charles , Lando and George.e30ernest wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:55I think it's a little bit of both. Schumacher probably couldn't adapt to that generation of cars and tires as quickly, and then he got paired with a strong team mate. The cars and tires at that time probably drove very differently to how Schumacher's cars did.NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:51If he was sandbagging, it cost him a seat in a team that has dominated the sport like no other. In reality, there's no way he would sandbag though. He just didnt have it anymore and/or Rosberg was actually a very good driver.e30ernest wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:32
Yeah I agree with this. Schumacher at that point was not a match for Rosberg. Based on the points tally I did last time, Rosberg would have gotten 2014-2016. This is unless Schumacher was sandbagging because the car was not competitive, but I do think he was giving it full beans against Rosberg.
The difference is Hamilton won't have taken 3 years off.NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:59Yeah thats true, the older you are I guess the slower you become at reacting and fine tuning these changes. Be interesting to see how a 37yr old Hamilton adapts to the 2022 rule changes compared to the likes of Max, Charles , Lando and George.e30ernest wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:55I think it's a little bit of both. Schumacher probably couldn't adapt to that generation of cars and tires as quickly, and then he got paired with a strong team mate. The cars and tires at that time probably drove very differently to how Schumacher's cars did.NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:51
If he was sandbagging, it cost him a seat in a team that has dominated the sport like no other. In reality, there's no way he would sandbag though. He just didnt have it anymore and/or Rosberg was actually a very good driver.
Then you ask, do drivers ever recover from time off ? or do they use that excuse 3yrs running ? Kimi had 2yrs out, came back an won a race in his first year back .Wass85 wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 09:04The difference is Hamilton won't have taken 3 years off.NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:59Yeah thats true, the older you are I guess the slower you become at reacting and fine tuning these changes. Be interesting to see how a 37yr old Hamilton adapts to the 2022 rule changes compared to the likes of Max, Charles , Lando and George.
The Mercedes of the yore that you are talking about, was the same Ross Brawn that was at Ferrari! While I take Brawn's statement that Schumacher never had a contracted No.2 at Ferrari, just like I believe Schumacher didn't have a contracted No. 2 at Mercedes either. It was just that some people have been peddling these lies that Schumacher had contracted No. 2, even though Brawn had flatly denied it. But it's a matter of convenience for some.NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:38No, remember what he said in the past. Mercedes dont do the whole number 1 and 2 thing Thats a Ferrari/Red Bull thing. If Mercedes dont do it now, why would they do it 10yrs ago ?Moore77 wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:24Based on your past record of statements, wasn't Rosberg Schumacher's No.2? OR are those lies just a matter of convenience?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:06
If Michael had stayed instead of retiring a second time, Rosberg would be a multiple champion. People forget that Rosberg beat Schumacher 3 - 0 in their time together at Mercedes.
Practically speaking, it was a dumb move too! Nobody in the right mind thought, Schumacher would do that. He left a winning team to take up an adventure! He could have stayed and won another title. Brawn, in one of his interviews mentioned that the Benetton of 1996, was a championship capable car in the hands of Schumacher. It was not like Hamilton's, frustrated driver leaving team situation.NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:48So IF and thats a big if, Hamilton's move was 'dumb' what does that make Michaels move that he signed in 1995 ? He went from a team that won 3 Championships in 2yrs, to a team that won 2 races in 5 YEARS!!!!! I mean Ferrari won 1 race in 1995, Benetton won 11 races. You must be calling that the dumbest move of last century ?
Ferrari was a big team that didn't make an impact even with Mansell and Prost! It was just the sheer brilliance of Schumacher to safe guard a struggling Todt, bring in Brawn and Byrne, which then became a success machine.NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:48We fans know in reality it was a great move, Ferrari a bigger team just underachieving. Like Mercedes, I know they were a new team in 2010, but it was clear to see the size of the team, like Ferrari from 91-95 they were underachieving and just needed to put some pieces in to place to become the dominant force it did. Both teams built around arguably the best driver of their generation. Everyone can see that, but you just cant say/accept that Lewis was good enough to see this. You have to stick to it being a fluke! The thread continues in an argument simply because you have to disagree with multiple people yet again.
Have you ever considered that maybe Kimi had a better car in his return season?NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 09:14Then you ask, do drivers ever recover from time off ? or do they use that excuse 3yrs running ? Kimi had 2yrs out, came back an won a race in his first year back .Wass85 wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 09:04The difference is Hamilton won't have taken 3 years off.NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 08:59
Yeah thats true, the older you are I guess the slower you become at reacting and fine tuning these changes. Be interesting to see how a 37yr old Hamilton adapts to the 2022 rule changes compared to the likes of Max, Charles , Lando and George.
The elephant in the room is that it's possible that Schumacher found himself back in a paddock with much more mature talent around than when he'd left it. That season, Schumacher ended the season with 4 world champions, a future world champion and two title runners up ahead of him. That was the season, let us remember, where the title lead swapped a record number of times over the season. There was a lot of talent on the grid at the time. In his back-to-back years, Michael was the class of the field, I don't think anyone would disagree. But on his return, the field was full of class. That his team mate beat him 3-0 is quite a surprise. Most would have expected a closer fight than that. But then Rosberg had always been known to be quick, he just often had a car that couldn't take him further.
It's the equivalent of Hamilton retiring in 2018 and coming back with the new regulation changes and going against George Russell.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 10:09The elephant in the room is that it's possible that Schumacher found himself back in a paddock with much more mature talent around than when he'd left it. That season, Schumacher ended the season with 4 world champions, a future world champion and two title runners up ahead of him. That was the season, let us remember, where the title lead swapped a record number of times over the season. There was a lot of talent on the grid at the time. In his back-to-back years, Michael was the class of the field, I don't think anyone would disagree. But on his return, the field was full of class. That his team mate beat him 3-0 is quite a surprise. Most would have expected a closer fight than that. But then Rosberg had always been known to be quick, he just often had a car that couldn't take him further.
Maybe.Wass85 wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 10:34It's the equivalent of Hamilton retiring in 2018 and coming back with the new regulation changes and going against George Russell.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 10:09The elephant in the room is that it's possible that Schumacher found himself back in a paddock with much more mature talent around than when he'd left it. That season, Schumacher ended the season with 4 world champions, a future world champion and two title runners up ahead of him. That was the season, let us remember, where the title lead swapped a record number of times over the season. There was a lot of talent on the grid at the time. In his back-to-back years, Michael was the class of the field, I don't think anyone would disagree. But on his return, the field was full of class. That his team mate beat him 3-0 is quite a surprise. Most would have expected a closer fight than that. But then Rosberg had always been known to be quick, he just often had a car that couldn't take him further.
That's the thing - there isn't a current equivalent. 2010 was a rare year where there was a lot of proven talent (7 titles (Vettel x3, Alonso x2, Hamilton x1, Button x1, plus one to come (Rosberg), a former title runner up (Massa) and Mark Webber who came 3rd 3 times) leading the table.
OK but you have the fact that he would be partnered alongside a young charger who would go on to win a world title.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑18 Sep 2020, 10:57That's the thing - there isn't a current equivalent. 2010 was a rare year where there was a lot of proven talent (7 titles (Vettel x3, Alonso x2, Hamilton x1, Button x1, plus one to come (Rosberg), a former title runner up (Massa) and Mark Webber who came 3rd 3 times) leading the table.
Although Felipe and Nico were well behind the others in the 2010 title race, they both scored twice the points that Michael did.
2010 was a rare year because all of the proven talent had machinery that could do the job, with the RedBull being marginally the best. Alonso, particularly, drove brilliantly that year, although all of the guys at the front had some excellent drives that year.
The equivalent would be Hamilton coming back to a midfield team in a grid where Max, Leclerc, Russell and Norris (to pick four current young guns) had all won titles and were fighting each other for the title. You'd get the occasional moment of "ah, yes, I remember he was the best of his day" but mostly you'd wonder why he was bothering.