jddh1 wrote:I would have to agree. Perhaps they will take photos of the paint ripples after a lap and analyze them. Clever idea.NaZzO wrote:
some kind of air flow monitoring ??
I can't find Bahrain, but here's Jerez:al_kar wrote:Hi guys!
Does anyone knows any site to give realtime timing from Bahrain of Jerez?
It's damned impressive that Webbo is that fast while still recovering from a broken leg!Roland Ehnström wrote:Well, everyone is faster today (better track conditions I guess), and Kovalainen has gained the most, virtually equalling Webber's time. Piquet still 1.5 seconds off the pace, and has driven the fewest number of laps again.
F1 Today have times from both and is fairly frequently updated:Scotracer wrote:I can't find Bahrain, but here's Jerez:al_kar wrote:Hi guys!
Does anyone knows any site to give realtime timing from Bahrain of Jerez?
http://www.f1today.nl/live-update/2009/ ... -de-jerez/
djos wrote:F1 Today have times from both and is fairly frequently updated:Scotracer wrote:I can't find Bahrain, but here's Jerez:al_kar wrote:Hi guys!
Does anyone knows any site to give realtime timing from Bahrain of Jerez?
http://www.f1today.nl/live-update/2009/ ... -de-jerez/
http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... %26hl%3Den
just click on the "live" link to the right of either Jerez or Bahrain.
They might want to check the differences to better understand what is caused by the '09 wing and what is caused by other changes.djos wrote:Yep, the Macca has its '08 wing on again:
http://74.125.19.113/translate_c?hl=en& ... 4picOtx9xw
I can't understand why they would do this in good weather? last time their excuse was because of the bad weather.
At what point in the lap does it 'dry'?McLaren's explanation:
"This is what we call a 'flow vis' (visualisation) - where we take a paraffin-based light solution and apply it to the car."
"The solution is light enough to flow over the car, drying quickly to determine the airflow over the bodywork."
*snigger*McLaren explained this is a routine operation. "This is a common occurrence when testing new cars and is used to confirm the wind tunnel readouts."
Get over yourself.kilcoo316 wrote:At what point in the lap does it 'dry'?McLaren's explanation:
"This is what we call a 'flow vis' (visualisation) - where we take a paraffin-based light solution and apply it to the car."
"The solution is light enough to flow over the car, drying quickly to determine the airflow over the bodywork."
What are the ambient conditions at the time it 'dries'?
Note - use of the word dry in inverted commas - as the viscosity will be changing right up to the point of 'drying' (i.e. eventually so viscous it ain't going nowhere anymore).
There are just so many variables to this testing 'method' that it reeks of desperation or a flat out decoy.
*snigger*McLaren explained this is a routine operation. "This is a common occurrence when testing new cars and is used to confirm the wind tunnel readouts."
A common occurence when something is FUBAR.
What do they determine from that - there is indeed a front wing wake at approximately 5 degrees (give or take 2 degrees - or something similarly ludicrious!).
Without having exact control over the boundary conditions, the explanation given is bull. You'll verify f**k all in the way of wind tunnel tests from some paint streaks on a surface that changes direction all the time.
For instance - what happens when the car is going laterally at 3g? Is the paint not expected to move towards the outside of the car?
Continue to accept the word of a PR officer without question then.Diesel wrote:Get over yourself.