There is an alternative. All teams moving to a Ferrari engine.Big Tea wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 11:51I just had an image of steam blowing the windows out at Ferrari HQ when they read thatEdax wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 02:05Here’s a thought. Mercedes has been rumored to sell their F1 team.
I doubt that deal would include engine dev. That is too close to Merc core technology. Not having a team affiliated to their name would mean they can be less picky about who they supply to.
Mercedes now supplies to 3 teams, 4 next year. 5 and 6 have just become available.
The step to a semi-spec series based around a single engine has suddenly become very small.
Then why use the current hybrid tech?Edax wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 02:05Here’s a thought. Mercedes has been rumored to sell their F1 team.
I doubt that deal would include engine dev. That is too close to Merc core technology. Not having a team affiliated to their name would mean they can be less picky about who they supply to.
Mercedes now supplies to 3 teams, 4 next year. 5 and 6 have just become available.
The step to a semi-spec series based around a single engine has suddenly become very small.
It would not be so bad if there were options for each team to 'mod' things. Use their own ECU or recovery/deployment etc, but the days of fitting their own injection system exhaust a and 'gubbins' are long gone, so not really much they can doEdax wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 13:36There is an alternative. All teams moving to a Ferrari engine.Big Tea wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 11:51I just had an image of steam blowing the windows out at Ferrari HQ when they read thatEdax wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 02:05Here’s a thought. Mercedes has been rumored to sell their F1 team.
I doubt that deal would include engine dev. That is too close to Merc core technology. Not having a team affiliated to their name would mean they can be less picky about who they supply to.
Mercedes now supplies to 3 teams, 4 next year. 5 and 6 have just become available.
The step to a semi-spec series based around a single engine has suddenly become very small.
As I see it this situation is not sustainable. Honda has pulled out, and frankly I am waiting for the same announcement from Renault.
Then we’re down to two. That is Michelin vs Bridgestone again an we know how that ends.
Besides I think Aston Martin and McLaren show that car manufacturers rather have their name on a winning frame than on a losing engine.
5kg maybe too much but just hypothetical. Make it 1kg per year. The thing with policing, is that There is no need to police the PU. You only need to police the amount of fuel that's in the tank. Let the PU maker make what they want, 3 cylinder up to 12, turbo or not, battery size, recovery. Let them figure out different solutions to run a race with the limit of energy and we will see creativity and great innovations on the track. If someone can make a simple PU cheap enough and use the energy efficient enough to compete that'd allow custom teams and everyone else to enter the sport.Schippke wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 04:36In theory, this sounds great... had not all the current engine manufactures invested so many billions into their current power units. They'd all just keep running with what they already have and optimise accordingly.
5kg less fuel a year would be next to impossible to achieve going forward as well... especially with current technology. Also, imagine the ruling and limitations in order to try and police that with several different type of potential engine variants.
Hate to say, it but with even NASCAR moving over to hybrids, I think we can officially close the chapter on naturally aspirated engines.the EDGE wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 13:43Then why use the current hybrid tech?Edax wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 02:05Here’s a thought. Mercedes has been rumored to sell their F1 team.
I doubt that deal would include engine dev. That is too close to Merc core technology. Not having a team affiliated to their name would mean they can be less picky about who they supply to.
Mercedes now supplies to 3 teams, 4 next year. 5 and 6 have just become available.
The step to a semi-spec series based around a single engine has suddenly become very small.
Why not move back cheap & reliable V8s. There’s plenty of billionaires wanting to play the real live version of F1 these days
If the costs can be controlled with the new budget cap & 2022 rules bro g card closer in performance we could have 30 cars on the grid in a few years time
You'll end up with a hybrid of some sort, probably like today's but with more channelling of energy through the ERS. Recovering energy wasted in braking is the single biggest way of increasing efficiency. I'd say front axle regen would develop quickly.
I would like that, even if it was a lime limited run of say 3 years while 'the company' what ever it had become got their own project off the ground.anthonyfa18 wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 16:10https://the-race.com/formula-1/honda-to ... d-of-2021/
Can it become redbull mugen honda for 2022 just like back in the day, rb can support some of the payment for the motor with redbull Technology group
A little over dramatic? Before McLaren pulled Honda back into F1 we had 3 engine manufacturers, so in that sense nothing is changing... Mercedes seems to be in (at least from a PU perspective) for the foreseeable future, Ferrari isn’t going anywhere and out of all manufacturers Renault is the one that seems more invested into at least the next 5 years.Edax wrote:There is an alternative. All teams moving to a Ferrari engine.Big Tea wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 11:51I just had an image of steam blowing the windows out at Ferrari HQ when they read thatEdax wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 02:05Here’s a thought. Mercedes has been rumored to sell their F1 team.
I doubt that deal would include engine dev. That is too close to Merc core technology. Not having a team affiliated to their name would mean they can be less picky about who they supply to.
Mercedes now supplies to 3 teams, 4 next year. 5 and 6 have just become available.
The step to a semi-spec series based around a single engine has suddenly become very small.
As I see it this situation is not sustainable. Honda has pulled out, and frankly I am waiting for the same announcement from Renault.
Then we’re down to two. That is Michelin vs Bridgestone again an we know how that ends.
Besides I think Aston Martin and McLaren show that car manufacturers rather have their name on a winning frame than on a losing engine.
Honda leaving after putting so much money into it and not winning a championship is going to really deter anyone coming in to F1 for the foreseeable future. I loved Honda and their ethos in F1, but the figures are what will be looked at down the line no matter what reason Honda gives for leaving.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑03 Oct 2020, 18:57A little over dramatic? Before McLaren pulled Honda back into F1 we had 3 engine manufacturers, so in that sense nothing is changing... Mercedes seems to be in (at least from a PU perspective) for the foreseeable future, Ferrari isn’t going anywhere and out of all manufacturers Renault is the one that seems more invested into at least the next 5 years.Edax wrote:There is an alternative. All teams moving to a Ferrari engine.
As I see it this situation is not sustainable. Honda has pulled out, and frankly I am waiting for the same announcement from Renault.
Then we’re down to two. That is Michelin vs Bridgestone again an we know how that ends.
Besides I think Aston Martin and McLaren show that car manufacturers rather have their name on a winning frame than on a losing engine.
Losing Honda won’t be the end of F1, just like it wasn’t when they left in previous eras.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk