I believe the entire point of this is an exercize to capitalize on the cost cutting that will be in place for 2010, including the testing ban during the season. They want an all-american team (although that negates Windsor...) and they want a european base in Spain.xpensive wrote:If this USF1 was serious, if they had the funding in place and if Windsor and Anderson were the right people to run an F1 team, surely it would be helluva lot easier just to buy the ex-Honda outfit in Brackley for a dollar and get on with it?
Those ideas about Charlotte and so on are just childish at best. In the past, Roger Penske, Parnelli Jones and Carl Haas all realized that having an F1 base in the US made very little sense. Engines, gearboxes and every thinkable sub-contractor is already in Europe anyway and hey, is there even an IRL-car designed and built in the US today?
You wouldn't really need to build the facilites in Spain. Although the facilites at Brackley are most probably much better, the Epsilon Euskadi facilites are responsible of a World Series by Renault team, some more lower category cars and are responsible also of a Le Mans LMP1 built from scratch there. And, as Villadeprat said, by sheer luck their wind tunnel is just as big as the new regulations will allow.xpensive wrote:I think your question should perhaps be reversed, why start building something from scratch, in the Carolinas or Spain, when you could have existing facilities in the middle of F1-country effectively for free, involving one of the more prominent and respected Technical directors in the F1 community?
Isn't the USF1 thing just a sticker anyway?
Most on-topic, 64m seems quite a low budget for a team. Even with cost-cutting measures and especially since it seems this team could incur into a higher than usual logistic expense. I think Minardi used to spend a comparable amount of money. But if cost-cutting measures really allow a 64m team to be mid-grid competitive, then I'll have to think they've been successful.xpensive wrote:This is getting interesting, an American F1 team with 64 MUSD in Basque country, hope ETA approves.
I think she should certainly test - maybe even be the official tester..but I agree that's the most she should do. To be involved will be hype enough. Then let someone much faster race. I think Scott Speed should be included, he's got experience that precious few other drivers in the US have.Birel99 wrote:Danica patrick has absolutely no right to drive an F1 car!
I have talked to many people that raced with her in karts over the years and every one says the same thing. She is slow, spoiled, and has no right to have moved up and out of karts! I doubt she even has the physical stamina to complete 20 laps in an F1 car!
What USF1 needs to do is sign me to drive! Ill even do it for free
Regards,