It was a rhetorical question but yes its pretty damn close to zero.... but I think the opposite of what you said would be more useful... mass to energy than back to mass... but hey same thing right.WhiteBlue wrote:zeroISLAMATRON wrote:How much does the mass of a battery increase while it is being charged?
if we could store mechanical energy by converting it to mass and mass back into mechanical energy that would be nice
Sorry, forgot to square Cxpensive wrote:It's obviously not a nuclear reaction, but I still believe E=mc^2 is relevant.
Afraid you forgot the square, when 400 kJ will mean m = 4.44E-12 kg, or 4.4 millionth of a milligram, correct?
Have you checked the F1technical BBS?Ciro Pabón wrote:...
joseff, shouldn't your 1985 post be already posted if Mr. Fusion will work? So, if it isn't posted, then it won't work.
Why don't you make yourself a promise to inform us in your next post, once you travel in time? You only have to dial 18-Feb-2009 and make a short stop.joseff wrote:Have you checked the F1technical BBS?Ciro Pabón wrote:...
joseff, shouldn't your 1985 post be already posted if Mr. Fusion will work? So, if it isn't posted, then it won't work.
Ciro Pabón wrote:
BTW, will Honda survive? Don't forget to post here the Sports Almanac for 2009-2019... Oh, and what kind of KERS do they use in 2019? Has the engine been entirely replaced by the KERS?
But why the mechanics? The trend is to make the driver more in control, isn't it? F1 starts would look like this.RacingManiac wrote:The race starts by having the mechanics push the car off the line(the sole energy input, the breakfast they had on race day)......
Actually the Isrealis would have bought it 20 years ago, but never acknowledged it and then gave part of it to Aparthied South Africa and India.alexbarwell wrote:Maybe if nuclear were an option then the Iranians might buy up the Honda team