Michael was really good at pushing the boundaries.
Lewis is one step behind, he stays in the grey areas. Lol.
Modern greats? Come on.... I wouldn't even call Prost a 'modern' great in the year 2020. I fully respect them and their opinions (Maybe Moss a little more than Stewart) but there will definitely and naturally be self interest in such declarations from them, in defending their era as the best. It'll happen with drivers from any era.
No former World Champion has anything to gain in defending their era as the best. They did what they did, and no matter what everybody else thinks about that time, it doesn't change the facts.El Scorchio wrote: ↑13 Nov 2020, 20:24Modern greats? Come on.... I wouldn't even call Prost a 'modern' great in the year 2020. I fully respect them and their opinions (Maybe Moss a little more than Stewart) but there will definitely and naturally be self interest in such declarations from them, in defending their era as the best. It'll happen with drivers from any era.
yes, and I think also race win and possibly pole.NathanOlder wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 18:49As I said in the race thread but it got lost, I think I'm right in thinking Lewis is the first driver to win a championship in 3 seperate decades ?
You know what i find interesting is how a car is judged as more dominant than another car. It is as dominant as the driver who makes it win. I think the more accurate words to use are "faster than the competition". A faster car can be driven by a driver that does not know how to win with it. For example when Lotus came back, the Raikonen and Grosjean pairing did not do that car justice. It was to me the fastest car on the grid on average over the season. It could have won the championship in Alonso's or Hamilton's hands.
He jumped in to mercedes when they were already the winning Mercedes, he didn’t make or form or structure the team like at least Schumacher did, and we can argue that Merc wouldn’t have been so successful without the input from MSC in the first place
"When Lewis turned up we knew he was going to be phenomenally quick," said chief engineer Andrew Shovlin. "But perhaps our misconceptions were that we didn't think he was necessarily going to be able to lead the team from a car development point of view.
"Often he would refer to feelings and things that were going on in the car that if you were looking at them in a strict engineering 'I know best, I'm an engineer' sense, you would think he was talking rubbish.
"But what he was actually feeling, while he may not have always described it in the right way, his ability to pick up on something that is not right - with the car's vehicle dynamics, aerodynamics, his sense for what the car was doing - was incredible.
"And it was very early on that you learned to ignore him at your peril, because if he was telling you something wasn't right, you had to be pretty certain of your own facts, otherwise you could end up looking a bit silly down the line.
"We might be one of the most successful teams in recent history, or for consecutive championships. But it would be arrogant to suggest that result would be the same if Lewis hadn't made the decision to come and join this team.
"The question of how much is the car and how much is the driver is missing the point. It's about getting the right group of people together if you want sustained success.
"Winning consecutive championships is about getting all those ingredients right, and Lewis has definitely played a big part in getting that balance right within the team."
Well Nico did a very good job at take advantage of the opportunities. Lewis to me was faster and still superior with race pace. Where Lewis underperformed is the race starts. A new clutch procedure was introduced by the FIA; and Rosberg ensured to be on top of that and most of the times this resulted in him getting the better starts and better strategy. Lewis decided to work on this too late into the championship. But even with that he still managed to outrace and finished ahead of Rosberg. But what can you do if your teammate has better reliability? And let's not forget that Hamilton dominated Rosberg three times before 2016. So not sure what this statement is about. And it was Rosberg's home; being a german driver in a team 3 years before Hamilton.The only driver who managed to beat him at “home” retired right away. (The story of it being too tough mentally still sounds a bit like a fairy tale)
Well, Bottas is not a No.2 driver. What is happening is there is less interference to help him beat Hamilton compared to Rosberg's time. Nico was coached on Hamilton's telemetry by Mercedes. I think they felt they owe it to Nico who was in the team longer, and also was German to win him a championship. The team learned after Nico left that it's best to manage their drivers fairly. And Bottas is now in that environment. So in fact i think it is generally more dificult for Bottas to beat Hamilton that it was for Rosberg in terms of getting a helping hand from the team.They also got the perfect n2 driver after Rosberg which is bottas
Interesting opinion. There are too many skillful drives against strong competition historically for me to agree with this.His whole image is only getting darker and darker the more he mixes political/religious beliefs with F1
I mean, objectively speaking, he got a lucky strike that nobody will ever have again
Topped up stats but still far away from the greats. He does get away with that clownish style of his because F1 is much more of a mainstream thing
Ok. Alonso is a great talent. Hamilton is more talented based on their time together; and also some other things observed with their driving. Wet weather driving is one. But i believe Alonso and Hamilton are the two best of their times. Alonso may have lost his edge now though.For example, Montoya arguably never beat anybody, but he was a character indeed, Alonso is another modern example
Well what if Senna never went to Mclaren? Shumacher never went to Ferrari or Benneton and stayed with Jordan?Hamilton will undoubtedly be remembered, it’s just that nobody would think of him had he decided to go somewhere else than Mercedes
Fake media!! MAGA!!This is also aside from the certain fakeness in current F1 that makes it unwatchable. The press, the racing and the teams, it does feel like a tv show sadly
Oh yeah, I honestly thought Piquet won in the 70's but having just looked, he didnt.Jolle wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 19:34yes, and I think also race win and possibly pole.NathanOlder wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 18:49As I said in the race thread but it got lost, I think I'm right in thinking Lewis is the first driver to win a championship in 3 seperate decades ?
I think looking at Raikkonen, Hamilton will do just fine into his early forties at the very least. He looks after himself better than Kimi does too AFAIK. I would go for unbeatable records if I was him. Why not.
There will be gnashing of teeth if he does win the remaining three. I am a fan, but i would like to see him get some pressure to add some spice to the season. I do understand why his detractors are in pain now. Sometimes his success gets tiring; but i am all for it.Shrieker wrote: ↑17 Nov 2020, 16:52By winning his 10th gp this season, Hamilton has bettered his personal best from 2014 - which was 11/19 (%57.9). His current for this season is 10/17 already (%58.9); assuming he doesn't win anymore.
If he wins all of the remaining 3 races, he'll break another record to become the most successful driver over a season. Both Schumacher and Vettel have won 13 races previously, but both had one more race to do it (18) compared to 17 this year.
Well you could say his best wins are when he was challenged Yes runaway wins make me sleepy too. If he gets challenged but still wins, then kudos, and who can blame him.
Yes yes ! I'm all for it !!NathanOlder wrote: ↑18 Nov 2020, 18:46Bahrain outter should be hard. I know they wont, but I'd love to see the Bahrain Outter to have 3 DRS Zones! and decent length zones too. The championships are done, so it wont really mess with that. Having 3 long zones will create a proper DRS Train! Anyone could win!!