Moore77 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2020, 21:13
falonso81 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2020, 21:08
Moore77 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2020, 21:05
What's the definition of racing?
Merc crushing everyone, Lewis crying about tyres and then posting fast laps. This should cover it.
There you go. This has been F1 for 7 years now and some of the rationale fans of Mercedes would be yawning on couch with the current "Racing". A bit of change is welcome. On pure performance, Mercedes was nowhere today. Deserving guy did well when it mattered today. Anyone that did not like the show, well deal with it please.
A bit of change is welcome for me as well. But what we've seen today was way more than just a bit of a change. It was pure chaos with an end result not indicative of driver skills (like Silo pointed out) or car performance at all. Max was 10 seconds faster than both Racing Points in Q1 and 3-4 seconds faster in Q2 and then boom, pole for Stroll. Almost the same goes for Albon btw, who also was significantly faster than both. What exactly does this prove? Better driving skills or better car performance? I guess even Racing Point themselves don't have an explanation for that other than luck of having had a better outlap or whatever.
How does wet track even out car differences and benefit more skilled drivers when you have Giovinazzi outperforming clearly better drivers and getting into top 10?
F1 is overengineered to the point that an oily and slippery resurfaced track with rain and overnight changes to tyre pressures in combination make up for too much of changes that the results depend more on luck than any other thing. I know it's same conditions for everyone, but at some point I'm sure you can't really prepare for all those factors anymore and just go out on track and hope for the best which I assume we've seen today.