zoroastar wrote:SmallSoldier wrote: ↑01 Dec 2020, 02:16
zoroastar wrote:
i thought the chassis were frozen for the most part next year. except for mclaren, since they are swapping PU's?
did something change?
All teams have 2 tokens to make modifications to their chassis (although the 2 tokens limits a lot what you can do in between seasons)... The big advantage for RP is that they can use the 2020 Mercedes Suspension (since they purchase that part from them), therefore they will have an improvement over their current suspension (which is the Mercedes 2019 one).
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
how much change do you think mclaren will be allowed, given their circumstances? i know a lot will have to be put into hitting the ground running with the merc in the back, but is it possible that they could take advantage of that to improve their car compared to everyone else? ive been watching the races but havent spent as much time in here as i had in previous years
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f622a/f622a5193171bee2eca4b7115a174cce7814de1f" alt="Smile :)"
i have some catching up to do...
Not really... In order for Mclaren to be allowed to change PU’s for 2021 the token system was created... Mclaren has to use their 2 tokens for the installation of the Merc engine and all changes needed “shouldn’t add additional performance”... This is the tricky part of course because there is a little bit of a grey area, but all changes are been monitored by the FIA and Mclaren needs to provide proof that not only are the changes necessary for the installation, that they also don’t provide additional advantage.
I’m sure there are a few changes that may be required and that could potentially add additional performance (for example, if the new PU architecture requires a longer wheel base), but those should be minimal... The advantage would in regards to packaging, potentially a better COG and weight distribution and of course an small improvement on power.
Since Mclaren can’t make use of any tokens for changes elsewhere in the chassis, they have used an important part of their resources to bring changes before the different deadlines (for example, the new nose)... The need to bring forward some of those parts have had a negative effect since not only their contributions aren’t maximized (bringing individual parts that are intended for a different concept, like the new nose usually don’t add performance by themselves) and it has also hampered the development of the current concept since some of the resources that could have been used to develop the MCL35 have been dedicated to speed up those parts (from design teams to manufacturing).
We are all hoping that once all the pieces of the puzzle are put together, that they will bring more performance for 2021 than what the rest of the teams are doing.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk