When you look at the TV pictures, it looked like they were going much faster [than the current cars]. So there is something to learn. I believe there is always something to learn.
I don't think anybody regrets from Formula 1 to have had the car out there, because we need to analyse now that we saw it live what is so attractive? Is it the audio and visual experience that makes it attractive? But then I saw the pictures without the sound, and it still looked great, so why is that? We need to analyse that.
I watched it first muted, it looked good, it looked fast and exciting. I don't care about sound/music/noise in general, so there has to be more to it than just "muh noise".jjn9128 wrote: ↑17 Dec 2020, 17:41Toto's views on the runWhen you look at the TV pictures, it looked like they were going much faster [than the current cars]. So there is something to learn. I believe there is always something to learn.
I don't think anybody regrets from Formula 1 to have had the car out there, because we need to analyse now that we saw it live what is so attractive? Is it the audio and visual experience that makes it attractive? But then I saw the pictures without the sound, and it still looked great, so why is that? We need to analyse that.
I wonder how much the length of the car affects this? The limousines they run now are hideous compared to pretty much any era car IMHO. I like the wider cars, or at least tyres, I remember how odd the 1998 cars looked when they got that much narrower all of a sudden. The old cars look amazing, like a handful to handle. I think that is what I like about them.
I think it's 50:50 length and weight - in terms of perception. Length makes more downforce and a more stable car, weight makes the cars slow (comparatively) to change direction.nokivasara wrote: ↑17 Dec 2020, 18:42I wonder how much the length of the car affects this? The limousines they run now are hideous compared to pretty much any era car IMHO. I like the wider cars, or at least tyres, I remember how odd the 1998 cars looked when they got that much narrower all of a sudden. The old cars look amazing, like a handful to handle. I think that is what I like about them.
Kind of like in MotoGP when the 4-strokes were introduced, I´ll never forget how Capirossi tried to cling on to the very nervous Ducati coming out of corners.
Todays cars maybe are too good, too easy to drive?
Hells yes!!! For first time in a while my desktop isn't a wind tunnel.
Disagree. There was no refueling between '84 and '93.
Refuelling was awful. It was all "try to pass in the pits". You could time between the on track overtakes with a calendar.
Instead, we have waddling whales full of fuel passing in the pits from the tyre "undercut"..Just_a_fan wrote: ↑19 Dec 2020, 00:50Refuelling was awful. It was all "try to pass in the pits". You could time between the on track overtakes with a calendar.
Dull, dull, dull.
Basically we had the teams actively pursuing strategies to keep the cars away from each other. Even the teams thought it was a boring way to go racing...Zynerji wrote: ↑19 Dec 2020, 00:53Instead, we have waddling whales full of fuel passing in the pits from the tyre "undercut"..Just_a_fan wrote: ↑19 Dec 2020, 00:50Refuelling was awful. It was all "try to pass in the pits". You could time between the on track overtakes with a calendar.
Dull, dull, dull.
Great trade off there...
Some of the fastest cars in F1 history and there is good on track overtaking. Other than at junk tracks like Abu Dhabi. Otherwise, you're spot on.Zynerji wrote: ↑19 Dec 2020, 00:53Instead, we have waddling whales full of fuel passing in the pits from the tyre "undercut"..Just_a_fan wrote: ↑19 Dec 2020, 00:50Refuelling was awful. It was all "try to pass in the pits". You could time between the on track overtakes with a calendar.
Dull, dull, dull.
Great trade off there...