There is already the Mercedes Applied Science division at Brackley for exactly these kind of things.Jolle wrote: ↑05 Jan 2021, 20:52Random thought, one of the reasons INEOS came on board as a shareholder.
With the incoming budget cap, the F1 work in Brackley has to be scaled down and will loose some flexibility. Could INEOS with its other high tech projects like the americas cup and the cycling team bring in additional work to diversify enough to keep staff and keep the company flexible enough? Bit like McLaren used to has their applied engineering division. “INEOS applied” or something.
Looking at in how much trouble the Brittania is having staying on the foils, I would say... that a nice projectlio007 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2021, 21:10There is already the Mercedes Applied Science division at Brackley for exactly these kind of things.Jolle wrote: ↑05 Jan 2021, 20:52Random thought, one of the reasons INEOS came on board as a shareholder.
With the incoming budget cap, the F1 work in Brackley has to be scaled down and will loose some flexibility. Could INEOS with its other high tech projects like the americas cup and the cycling team bring in additional work to diversify enough to keep staff and keep the company flexible enough? Bit like McLaren used to has their applied engineering division. “INEOS applied” or something.
Similar to Red Bull Advanced Technologies (e.g. Valkyrie, Indycar Aeroscreen,...).
What if~ ineos wanted something developed because they were studying a F1 car? That would not count against merc then as it is 'pure research' for a customerJolle wrote: ↑05 Jan 2021, 20:52Random thought, one of the reasons INEOS came on board as a shareholder.
With the incoming budget cap, the F1 work in Brackley has to be scaled down and will loose some flexibility. Could INEOS with its other high tech projects like the americas cup and the cycling team bring in additional work to diversify enough to keep staff and keep the company flexible enough? Bit like McLaren used to has their applied engineering division. “INEOS applied” or something.
Well... they are not a customer anymore... Ferrari can get away with that stuff with HAASBig Tea wrote: ↑05 Jan 2021, 22:03What if~ ineos wanted something developed because they were studying a F1 car? That would not count against merc then as it is 'pure research' for a customerJolle wrote: ↑05 Jan 2021, 20:52Random thought, one of the reasons INEOS came on board as a shareholder.
With the incoming budget cap, the F1 work in Brackley has to be scaled down and will loose some flexibility. Could INEOS with its other high tech projects like the americas cup and the cycling team bring in additional work to diversify enough to keep staff and keep the company flexible enough? Bit like McLaren used to has their applied engineering division. “INEOS applied” or something.
HPP is a separate company fully owned by Mercedes UK, which is part of Daimler AGPlatinumZealot wrote: ↑11 Jan 2021, 01:42Does Ineos have an share in Brixworth with their aquisition? Or is HPP solely owned by Daimler?
Yeah speculation is rife on this one. It would be a bombshell though if Sir Lewis gets dropped for Russell though...Jolle wrote: ↑13 Jan 2021, 11:45Another possibility is that, what both parties said, we are going to continue with each other is true (they are both not known for games on this front) and after a very very long season, where everybody was just tired at the end, they will sit down before the first test to iron out the small details.
Really can’t see that happeninge30ernest wrote: ↑13 Jan 2021, 11:49Yeah speculation is rife on this one. It would be a bombshell though if Sir Lewis gets dropped for Russell though...Jolle wrote: ↑13 Jan 2021, 11:45Another possibility is that, what both parties said, we are going to continue with each other is true (they are both not known for games on this front) and after a very very long season, where everybody was just tired at the end, they will sit down before the first test to iron out the small details.