I think so. It seems more basic than the ones seem on McLaren or AlphaTauri. Nothing substantially different in terms of winglets or the aero treatment to the old floor.
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
I think so. It seems more basic than the ones seem on McLaren or AlphaTauri. Nothing substantially different in terms of winglets or the aero treatment to the old floor.
AT is continuing with the 2019 RB15 rear end this year.PowerandtheGlory wrote: ↑23 Feb 2021, 16:50
The rear undercut looks... suuuuper aggressive in these hi-res photos..
I think by adopting the new engine they have been able yo optimize this area perhaps..
Be good to see if thr AlphaTauri is just as aggressive here too..
I think RB may well have stolen a march on others...
Edit: yea ive looked the AlphaT looks almost as aggressive.. i guess alphaT would be using 2020 RB rear end, so we can compare last years RB - but with the new engine.. and tgis years rear and engine..
Red Bull has been back and forth with those 2 noses, i can't be sure the presentation nose is the one that's gonna be in the car in first race.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑23 Feb 2021, 17:01Interesting that they seem to have ditched the latest version of the nose they run in Abu Dhabi, I thought they were going to further develop that concept:
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202102 ... c5e782.jpg
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
No, a token value was assigned to each change. Both of those changes would require 2 each so not possibleSirBastianVettel wrote: ↑23 Feb 2021, 20:49They changed the rear suspension. If I'm not mistaken that would mean they also changed the gearbox (different mounting points). So does that count as two tokens?
godlameroso wrote: ↑23 Feb 2021, 21:01https://files.catbox.moe/cqjkyz.png
Drunken rendition time
Red is high pressure stream lines, blue/purple low pressure stream lines.