Allison and co have always had a much better power unit than Newey, Wache and co. It doesn't necessarily mean that Newey, Wache and co are the inferior team of chassis engineers than their Mercedes counterparts... This Red Bull engineering team has excellent stability of personnel too and consistently high quality of design and concept.MKlaus wrote: ↑20 Mar 2021, 09:44this is the same team that has demonstrated their skills over varying regulations, yet has comfortably won 7 double titles. every time a problem has struck, they came back with even stronger performance. just shows the quality of their knowledge, tools and processes. all that wouldn't vanish a minute.
If true, the lack of the aforementioned Mercedes HPP customer power unit in the 2018 Red Bull is unfortunate.
It's gross oversimplification when mercedes success is wrapped under engine guise.JordanMugen wrote: ↑20 Mar 2021, 19:14Allison and co have always had a much better power unit than Newey, Wache and co. It doesn't necessarily mean that Newey, Wache and co are the inferior team of chassis engineers than their Mercedes counterparts... This Red Bull engineering team has excellent stability of personnel too and consistently high quality of design and concept.MKlaus wrote: ↑20 Mar 2021, 09:44this is the same team that has demonstrated their skills over varying regulations, yet has comfortably won 7 double titles. every time a problem has struck, they came back with even stronger performance. just shows the quality of their knowledge, tools and processes. all that wouldn't vanish a minute.
It seems like you are mixing the efforts of the power unit team and chassis team as if they are the same thing. What has always been bizarre is the refusal to supply the Mercedes power units to Red Bull, such that the efforts of Mercedes HPP would benefit Mercedes GP and Red Bull Racing equally, in the spirit of friendly competition.
Red Bull Racing would gladly pay the commercial rates that Williams or McLaren pay for the customer power units, and Red Bull Racing is a business of strong financial solvency without the credit issues of other F1 teams like Force India or Manor Racing, yet no contract was offered to Red Bull -- but instead to Manor Racing who then went out of business.
It would have been great to see a battle of Mercedes-Mercedes and Red Bull-Mercedes from 2016 to present day.
You could set up the race thread yourself...godlameroso wrote: ↑20 Mar 2021, 15:22The GP is next weekend, where's the race thread? I have a weather prediction for the GP weekend. Dry and windy, less warm at night. Wind blowing to the SSE. I know, the accuracy is astonishing, but I can't take the credit, my finger held to the wind does most of the work.
I dont understand why would you rate Williams lower than Haas, since Haas didnt invest any tokens into their car, while Williams was allready better than them in the second half of the last season? Not to mention that Williams have more experienced driver pairing as well.
Mercedes HPP and Mercedes GP are completely different companies. Revenue from Mercedes HPP customer sales are independent of Mercedes GP. Selling power units or engines is an integral part of Formula One racing for power unit builders.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑20 Mar 2021, 21:48"You've developed a really strong engine, so you should supply it to your closest competitor to let them have a chance of beating you"
Why didn't Red Bull do like Mercedes and developed their own engine then? Mercedes is supposed to invest tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars in development to then just give that to the competition?
How can you know that if Red Bull had less power unit output at their disposal? The 1995 Benetton-Renault was more difficult to handle than the 1995 Williams-Renault, yet the Benetton was still the championship winning car. Having the same power unit supplier (in that case Renault), made this comparison more straightforward.
No, they don't have that right. Mercedes HPP have to supply a set number of teams as a power unit supplier when called upon, as the sporting regulations specify. Just as Renault or Red Bull Powertrains will have to do so too.
mercedes had the option of supplying to 4 teams and they chose it wisely, which they were entitled to. like i mentioned, red bull didn't conduct themselves well in renault seperation and if a manufacturer takes objection of that and doesn't supply to that team, there is nothing in rules to force the supply. besides, whichever customer mercedes chose to supply, is their prerogative and there is nothing unreasonable about it. if red bull was serious about competing, instead of expecting mercedes to supply engines, they should have started building their own engines. other than the fantasy of f1 fans, there was no good competitive or commercial reason for mercedes to provide engines to red bull.JordanMugen wrote: ↑21 Mar 2021, 12:35No, they don't have that right. Mercedes HPP have to supply a set number of teams as a power unit supplier when called upon, as the sporting regulations specify. Just as Renault or Red Bull Powertrains will have to do so too.
It would seem unreasonable that Mercedes HPP would do things like signing up an insolvent Manor Racing instead of Red Bull Racing, whereas Red Bull Powertrains will, on the other hand, gladly sign up Brackley Grand Prix team when called upon.
I’m pretty sure the oil ban was for ferrari not Mercedes, Ferrari were the ones with and extra auxiliary oil tank...MKlaus wrote: ↑20 Mar 2021, 20:11It's gross oversimplification when mercedes success is wrapped under engine guise.JordanMugen wrote: ↑20 Mar 2021, 19:14Allison and co have always had a much better power unit than Newey, Wache and co. It doesn't necessarily mean that Newey, Wache and co are the inferior team of chassis engineers than their Mercedes counterparts... This Red Bull engineering team has excellent stability of personnel too and consistently high quality of design and concept.MKlaus wrote: ↑20 Mar 2021, 09:44this is the same team that has demonstrated their skills over varying regulations, yet has comfortably won 7 double titles. every time a problem has struck, they came back with even stronger performance. just shows the quality of their knowledge, tools and processes. all that wouldn't vanish a minute.
It seems like you are mixing the efforts of the power unit team and chassis team as if they are the same thing. What has always been bizarre is the refusal to supply the Mercedes power units to Red Bull, such that the efforts of Mercedes HPP would benefit Mercedes GP and Red Bull Racing equally, in the spirit of friendly competition.
Red Bull Racing would gladly pay the commercial rates that Williams or McLaren pay for the customer power units, and Red Bull Racing is a business of strong financial solvency without the credit issues of other F1 teams like Force India or Manor Racing, yet no contract was offered to Red Bull -- but instead to Manor Racing who then went out of business.
It would have been great to see a battle of Mercedes-Mercedes and Red Bull-Mercedes from 2016 to present day.
2017 aero changes were brought because of pressure from red bull and mclaren, both of whom claimed they have better chassis and struggling because of pu and needed more opportunities on aero side. red bull turned up with a complete dud in 2017. 2018 wasn't any different either. in 2019 and 2020 they created unpredictable cars that claimed careers of two young drivers and without verstappen's talent, the situation could have been more humiliating. they even pushed for quali mode ban last year, but result wasn't any different. in previous years they had pushed for oil burning bans to slow down mercedes.
that doesn't sound like a team that is on par with mercedes when it comes to building great chassis in the hybrid era. they may get it right at some point, but so far they haven't and by that, they are not on par, not yet.
in a recent interview, john owen explained how they deliberately kept the attention on pu rather than on their chassis to avoid anyone copying their ideas, which is what everyone fell for.
mercedes not supplying red bull has two reasons. one, obviously mercedes didn't want to help competition, which they have every right to do. this is competition and everyone is out there for themselves and not for charity. two, red bull was a bad customer as proven with renault saga. what is more bizarre is, why red bull waited this long to have their own engine division?
Red Bull build a dud in 2017 and 2018? Those dud cars won 7 races despite a 40 horsepower deficit.MKlaus wrote: ↑20 Mar 2021, 20:11It's gross oversimplification when mercedes success is wrapped under engine guise.JordanMugen wrote: ↑20 Mar 2021, 19:14Allison and co have always had a much better power unit than Newey, Wache and co. It doesn't necessarily mean that Newey, Wache and co are the inferior team of chassis engineers than their Mercedes counterparts... This Red Bull engineering team has excellent stability of personnel too and consistently high quality of design and concept.MKlaus wrote: ↑20 Mar 2021, 09:44this is the same team that has demonstrated their skills over varying regulations, yet has comfortably won 7 double titles. every time a problem has struck, they came back with even stronger performance. just shows the quality of their knowledge, tools and processes. all that wouldn't vanish a minute.
It seems like you are mixing the efforts of the power unit team and chassis team as if they are the same thing. What has always been bizarre is the refusal to supply the Mercedes power units to Red Bull, such that the efforts of Mercedes HPP would benefit Mercedes GP and Red Bull Racing equally, in the spirit of friendly competition.
Red Bull Racing would gladly pay the commercial rates that Williams or McLaren pay for the customer power units, and Red Bull Racing is a business of strong financial solvency without the credit issues of other F1 teams like Force India or Manor Racing, yet no contract was offered to Red Bull -- but instead to Manor Racing who then went out of business.
It would have been great to see a battle of Mercedes-Mercedes and Red Bull-Mercedes from 2016 to present day.
2017 aero changes were brought because of pressure from red bull and mclaren, both of whom claimed they have better chassis and struggling because of pu and needed more opportunities on aero side. red bull turned up with a complete dud in 2017. 2018 wasn't any different either. in 2019 and 2020 they created unpredictable cars that claimed careers of two young drivers and without verstappen's talent, the situation could have been more humiliating. they even pushed for quali mode ban last year, but result wasn't any different. in previous years they had pushed for oil burning bans to slow down mercedes.
that doesn't sound like a team that is on par with mercedes when it comes to building great chassis in the hybrid era. they may get it right at some point, but so far they haven't and by that, they are not on par, not yet.
in a recent interview, john owen explained how they deliberately kept the attention on pu rather than on their chassis to avoid anyone copying their ideas, which is what everyone fell for.
Could we see a team actively look to not finish so high in order to secure more development tools for the following season? A difference in one place on the table - say coming 6th instead of 5th - might not be too costly in terms of prize money but it might give a useful bonus in wind tunnel and CFD time.There are some interesting trade off games to be played in the midfield. If you're sufficiently funded to be at the cost cap without the need for the prize money to "top up" your accounts, finishing lower down the title table gives you more time in the wind tunnel and CFD. Which potentially gives an advantage in the early part of the new regulation regime.