Yes, but we are talking about the “spirit” of the rules now. As the rear wing followed them perfectly to the letter too.
DAS was though a very unique situation, it wasn’t banned on technical grounds, it was bound on cost grounds... It wasn’t going against any regulation, FIA simply wanted to avoid teams investing in developing the system.Marti_EF3 wrote:What bothers me is that they allowed DAS for a full season, and here we go when Mercedes start crying, FIA acts inmediately like it was no flex wings before
Was it same FIA which can avoid Mercedes itself to spent on it by saying we will not allow it when they asked FIA about it?SmallSoldier wrote: ↑24 May 2021, 19:13DAS was though a very unique situation, it wasn’t banned on technical grounds, it was bound on cost grounds... It wasn’t going against any regulation, FIA simply wanted to avoid teams investing in developing the system.Marti_EF3 wrote:What bothers me is that they allowed DAS for a full season, and here we go when Mercedes start crying, FIA acts inmediately like it was no flex wings before
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Check out this article, it explains a lot.etusch wrote: ↑24 May 2021, 19:19Was it same FIA which can avoid Mercedes itself to spent on it by saying we will not allow it when they asked FIA about it?SmallSoldier wrote: ↑24 May 2021, 19:13DAS was though a very unique situation, it wasn’t banned on technical grounds, it was bound on cost grounds... It wasn’t going against any regulation, FIA simply wanted to avoid teams investing in developing the system.Marti_EF3 wrote:What bothers me is that they allowed DAS for a full season, and here we go when Mercedes start crying, FIA acts inmediately like it was no flex wings before
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
They couldn’t avoid spending the money because the 2020 regulations were already approved... The misconception in the current situation is that the FIA is changing the regulations in regards to the Rear Wing, that is not correct... The regulations are staying the same, what is changing is the tests performed to ensure that the regulations are followed. Two different situations at play.etusch wrote:Was it same FIA which can avoid Mercedes itself to spent on it by saying we will not allow it when they asked FIA about it?SmallSoldier wrote: ↑24 May 2021, 19:13DAS was though a very unique situation, it wasn’t banned on technical grounds, it was bound on cost grounds... It wasn’t going against any regulation, FIA simply wanted to avoid teams investing in developing the system.Marti_EF3 wrote:What bothers me is that they allowed DAS for a full season, and here we go when Mercedes start crying, FIA acts inmediately like it was no flex wings before
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Agreed, not only that, but the reason they banned it for the following season would be the costs associated with everyone attempting to develop such a system, and completely ignored the fact that Merc gained an advantage from a loophole in the rules
You are mixing up innovation vs grey area
Not really.