No bets, but the fact that even bagnaia in 4th with no race wins, can successfully defend with solely 2nds against marc winning every single gp from now on this season, is to me a clear sign that the motogp scoring system doesn't value wins much.What a crazy championship... any bet about who will win the title?
MotoGP scoring system value victories more than any other, giving 38.9% more points to the winner than the second.drc wrote: ↑24 Jun 2021, 07:55No bets, but the fact that even bagnaia in 4th with no race wins, can successfully defend with solely 2nds against marc winning every single gp from now on this season, is to me a clear sign that the motogp scoring system doesn't value wins much.What a crazy championship... any bet about who will win the title?
There are many. That 38.9% is the f1, and many derivatives', format.MotoGP scoring system value victories more than any other, giving 38.9% more points to the winner than the second.
Do you know any other better than that?
My bad, sorry for the mistake. But anycase it´s still valuing victories more than most series. You can´t ask for a scoring system where a driver/rider can miss a good percentage of the season and still fight for the title.drc wrote: ↑24 Jun 2021, 16:49There are many. That 38.9% is the f1, and many derivatives', format.MotoGP scoring system value victories more than any other, giving 38.9% more points to the winner than the second.
Do you know any other better than that?
The moto (3,2 and gp) one has a 25% increase, 20 to 25 points.
To me, things are unbalanced when a racer scoring zero wins, outdoes another one who wins more than 63% of all the races (so that's including the 2 he was absent and the 3 he crashed in) the way in this bagnaia-márquez case.
No worries.My bad, sorry for the mistake.
Hmm, dunno bout that. Sure, series like nascar and supercars are worse in that respect, but I think they're in the minority by far.it´s still valuing victories more than most series.
Agree, but in this case marc only missed 2 out of 19, still within margins IMO.You can´t ask for a scoring system where a driver/rider can miss a good percentage of the season and still fight for the title.
Then I'd like it even less But again, I don't think "most series" have this 10-9 in the first place. As a matter of fact, I don't know any.If you don´t like the 25-20 scoring for the winner-second, what if it was 10-9 like most series?
Agree that not only race victories matter, and that mistakes must be punished in a balanced scoring system but IMO, the current system doesn't tip the scales in favour of the race winner, but actually to his disadvantage, relatively speaking.you can´t only value victories in a fight for the title, (..) Mistakes must be taken into consideration and if you give even more advantage to the winner, then they won´t
I don't think the outcome of that particular year was unfair actually. And it was SEN who was the one with the more race wins, 8 to 7. PRO scored more points, 105 vs 94, but only 87 of his counted towards the WDC, to 90 for SEN.solution might be like F1 had where you take out few of riders worst results out of the count, but that still can be unfair (Senna won one championship even though Prost had more wins because results taken away from Prost were better than those taken away from Senna)