subcritical71 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2021, 19:56
dtro wrote: ↑29 Aug 2021, 19:46
Kaay
I guess I'll just ignore all the other wet races that were held since then. I stand by my statement, there was a time when how the drivers felt was irrelevant and it was an objective standard of whether or not the medical helicopter can take off or not.
This was a farcical event.
RIP Jules.
In my observation ever since Japan 2014 the FIA have gotten a bit more cautious in the rain, particularly in heavy rain which could be seen today. Was the medical helicopter able to take off and get to a trauma facility today? (I'm asking, I don't know) Is the medical helicopter IFR certified and is the pilot instrument rated?
In my recollection during Charlie Whiting's time it was a matter of the helicopter being able to take off or not. When the helicopter couldn't take off during Hurricane Patricia in Austin 2015 they cancelled one of the free practice sessions and maybe moved the qualifying to the next day but it wasn't because drivers complained about visibility or lack thereof.
Regardless, 20 F1 cars on track would clear standing water better than 5 tractors with street sweeper attachments. There was definitely a window of time when we could have raced today and we ended up waiting four hours for a farcical result.
Easier than refunding the money to spectators at the track I suppose.