Spot on. Now that mystery is solved
On the canister thingy; I doubt it is this, but what size reservoir would you need for a hydraulic KERS setup?madly wrote:Zgred thanks, great photo!
Below HiRes version with brightened dark areas.
and HiRes link: http://sliwinski.priv.pl/f1/r31_fee_2011_03_24.jpg
EDIT: typo
Im thiking it could be the engine air compressor expansion vessel.avatar wrote:On the canister thingy; I doubt it is this, but what size reservoir would you need for a hydraulic KERS setup?madly wrote:Zgred thanks, great photo!
Below HiRes version with brightened dark areas.
and HiRes link: http://sliwinski.priv.pl/f1/r31_fee_2011_03_24.jpg
EDIT: typo
I like the idea of it, but it would surely add enough weight for it to be a hindrance on performance? I'm not sure I would go to all the bother of having this innovative exhaust system, just to nullify a degree of it's performance by adding weight for safety devices. Just a thought.Robbobnob wrote:I quite like the fire extinguisher idea, particularly as we have seen the damage the car does to the tarmac during pitstops with its exhaust system, and extinguisher could be a very sensible addition.
Though another quick thought is the figure "45.12?? 75.0 lambda" i wonder what this could signify, or whether thats just left over from the building of the chassis
Stop inventing phantom inlets? Your looking at one sidepod intake, simple as.madly wrote: HiRes: http://sliwinski.priv.pl/f1/r31_fee_201 ... _areas.jpg
Could be inlets 1 and 2 separate or areas 1 & 2 are one big inlet?
What about suspected inlet 3?
Code: Select all
14.1 Fire extinguishers :
14.1.1 All cars must be fitted with a fire extinguishing system which will discharge into the cockpit and into the engine compartment.
14.1.2 Any extinguishant listed in the Appendix to the regulations is permitted.
14.1.3 The quantity of extinguishant may vary according to the type of extinguishant used, a list of quantities may be found in the Appendix to these regulations.
14.1.4 When operated, the fire extinguishing system must discharge 95% of its contents at a constant pressure in no less than 10 seconds and no more than 30 seconds. If more than one container with extinguishant is fitted, they must be released simultaneously.
14.1.5 Each pressure vessel must be equipped with a means of checking its pressure which may vary according to the type of extinguishant used. A list of pressures may be found in the Appendix to the regulations.
14.1.6 The following information must be visible on each container with extinguishant :
a) Type of extinguishant ;
b) Weight or volume of the extinguishant ;
c) Date the container must be checked which must be no more than two years after the date of filling.
14.1.7 All parts of the extinguishing system must be situated within the survival cell and all extinguishing equipment must withstand fire.
14.1.8 Any triggering system having its own source of energy is permitted, provided it is possible to operate all extinguishers should the main electrical circuits of the car fail.
The driver must be able to trigger the extinguishing system manually when seated normally with his safety belts fastened and the steering wheel in place.
Furthermore, means of triggering from the outside must be combined with the circuit breaker switches described in Article 14.2.2. They must be marked with a letter "E" in red inside a white circle of at least 100mm diameter with a red edge.
14.1.9 The system must work in any position, even when the car is inverted.
14.1.10 All extinguisher nozzles must be suitable for the extinguishant and be installed in such a way that they are not directly pointed at the driver.
If you zoom in you can see nearly every carbon piece has a similar number. I suspect it is the serial number for each part. The Lamda looks like a 2 or L to me. As in L for left side of car?Robbobnob wrote:Though another quick thought is the figure "45.12?? 75.0 lambda" i wonder what this could signify, or whether thats just left over from the building of the chassis
Actually we know that the Renault has a small inlet on the inboard side of the duct. It appears to be the area indictaed as 3 by madly. As for 2 in his image, I'd say it's just shadowing and a bit of image noise.Diesel wrote:Stop inventing phantom inlets? Your looking at one sidepod intake, simple as.madly wrote: HiRes: http://sliwinski.priv.pl/f1/r31_fee_201 ... _areas.jpg
Could be inlets 1 and 2 separate or areas 1 & 2 are one big inlet?
What about suspected inlet 3?