And it will be the first GP since.... 73, I think? To not feature an Italian. Or so I'm told.
Pirelli expects the harder "option" to be 2 seconds quicker than the softer "prime" (in keeping line with their reversed nomenclature for this race)
presumably you mean softer and harder the other way round there. Tbh, I think Ferrari are buggered here, the last time Pirrelli broke out the hards (rather than the mediums) Ferrari couldn't get heat into them for 5-10 laps.raymondu999 wrote:And it will be the first GP since.... 73, I think? To not feature an Italian. Or so I'm told.
Pirelli expects the harder "option" to be 2 seconds quicker than the softer "prime" (in keeping line with their reversed nomenclature for this race)
Oh, I hadn't realised that they'd reversed option and prime, I take back my earlier comment. This sounds like a very interesting approach. It should indeed stop a wasted set of tyres being left over.richard_leeds wrote:The reason they use option/prime is because the number of tyres allocated is different, they usually get more of the ... errr... harder set?. The compounds are reversed this race so that teams get more of the softer set this time???
I'd rather they simply called them harder/softer for the public as the actual compound and number of sets is only needed for the teams and uber-geeks.
When watching I just want to know if the car is on the harder set or the softer set. It'll make the commentary much easier.
ringo wrote:Well is pass it on to williams F1 and Vall.