Ok nevermind, I rest my case, no point in discussing further.
Because employers can't hold employees to ransom in the UK. The employers have to act in a reasonable way. As with the Dan Fallows case, it's unlikely Mercedes or Red Bull could have secured an outcome that fully enforces the notice period, so they agree a compromise.Wouter wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 21:18It's probably no coincidence that RB let Dan Fallows go to Aston Martin Cognizant F1 Team much earlierlio007 wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 19:25That's good news:
https://twitter.com/redbullracing/statu ... 92576?s=20
and Mercedes now let Hodgkinson go to RB Powertrains much earlier.
You should really understand how the employment laws work and the significance of gardening leaves. I don't think these negotiations took place because they are illegal and can't stand in courts. You argued initially that Dan has already started whereas he basically did an illegal new contract without consent from his current employer. As per that he was to join AM in Jan this year. But despite with negotiations he is to join by April. Toto is a stake holder in AM, which is enough to suggest these two negotiations are connected. Nothing is coincidence in F1 world.west52keep64 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022, 18:24Because employers can't hold employees to ransom in the UK. The employers have to act in a reasonable way. As with the Dan Fallows case, it's unlikely Mercedes or Red Bull could have secured an outcome that fully enforces the notice period, so they agree a compromise.Wouter wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 21:18It's probably no coincidence that RB let Dan Fallows go to Aston Martin Cognizant F1 Team much earlierlio007 wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 19:25That's good news:
https://twitter.com/redbullracing/statu ... 92576?s=20
and Mercedes now let Hodgkinson go to RB Powertrains much earlier.
It's very doubtful these two announcements are linked in any way other than what I've just said.
I mean... the negotiations have happened, because both people have been released from their contractsRyar wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022, 18:31You should really understand how the employment laws work and the significance of gardening leaves. I don't think these negotiations took place because they are illegal and can't stand in courts. You argued initially that Dan has already started whereas he basically did an illegal new contract without consent from his current employer. As per that he was to join AM in Jan this year. But despite with negotiations he is to join by April. Toto is a stake holder in AM, which is enough to suggest these two negotiations are connected. Nothing is coincidence in F1 world.
It’s legal to negotiate an early release but it’s illegal to have an agreement between companies not to hire each other’s employees, like they had in Silicon Valley some time ago. One does benefit and protect the employee, the other one clearly doesn’t.west52keep64 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022, 21:12I mean... the negotiations have happened, because both people have been released from their contractsRyar wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022, 18:31You should really understand how the employment laws work and the significance of gardening leaves. I don't think these negotiations took place because they are illegal and can't stand in courts. You argued initially that Dan has already started whereas he basically did an illegal new contract without consent from his current employer. As per that he was to join AM in Jan this year. But despite with negotiations he is to join by April. Toto is a stake holder in AM, which is enough to suggest these two negotiations are connected. Nothing is coincidence in F1 world.
There's nothing "illegal" about negotiating an early release from a lengthy notice period, it happens all the time. These are matters of civil law, not criminal law.
Yes I agree... but where did that come from? I don't think I suggested that was what was happening? All I suggested was that the early release of both employees from their contracts was the result of their employers being fair and reasonable.
That’s good to hear Wouter.
Why on earth would Mercedes give its engine to its closest rival? Let’s not forget that Mercedes has comprehensively beat all its customer teams so the chassis can’t be all that bad.Alexf1 wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 14:10They at least shared the engine, something Mercedes was too afraid to do. Inferior chassis maybe?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 13:36That's all part of the sport - getting the right engine is as important as getting the aero right. As technical director of the team, part of the failure to get the right engine falls at his feet. You have to accept responsibility for failures as well as accept the plaudits for successes.
McLaren had one of the best engines back when Newey was there - the Ilmor-Mercedes units were as good as any on the grid. So that needs to be remembered.
Red Bull didn't have the fastest PU in the Vettel-winning years, but they had the PU that gave the best diffuser blowing performance, even when the FIA tried to reduce the effectiveness of blowing. They tended not to give Renault the credit back then, but were quick to throw them under the bus in the hybrid era. That sticks in the throat a bit, for me - "we're winning because we're the best but we're losing because they messed up".
Anyway, as I say in another post, I'm looking forward to seeing what Newey's team comes up with this year. The PU is now top drawer so it's going to come down to the designers to get the platform working well. Exciting times for us all, I'm sure you'll agree.
You're answering your own question. They only want to supply teams that are not close rivals.Csmith1980 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2022, 15:02Why on earth would Mercedes give its engine to its closest rival? Let’s not forget that Mercedes has comprehensively beat all its customer teams so the chassis can’t be all that bad.Alexf1 wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 14:10They at least shared the engine, something Mercedes was too afraid to do. Inferior chassis maybe?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑21 Jan 2022, 13:36
That's all part of the sport - getting the right engine is as important as getting the aero right. As technical director of the team, part of the failure to get the right engine falls at his feet. You have to accept responsibility for failures as well as accept the plaudits for successes.
McLaren had one of the best engines back when Newey was there - the Ilmor-Mercedes units were as good as any on the grid. So that needs to be remembered.
Red Bull didn't have the fastest PU in the Vettel-winning years, but they had the PU that gave the best diffuser blowing performance, even when the FIA tried to reduce the effectiveness of blowing. They tended not to give Renault the credit back then, but were quick to throw them under the bus in the hybrid era. That sticks in the throat a bit, for me - "we're winning because we're the best but we're losing because they messed up".
Anyway, as I say in another post, I'm looking forward to seeing what Newey's team comes up with this year. The PU is now top drawer so it's going to come down to the designers to get the platform working well. Exciting times for us all, I'm sure you'll agree.
Same goes for virtual any sports team or business, right.Alexf1 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2022, 15:11You're answering your own question. They only want to supply teams that are not close rivals.Csmith1980 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2022, 15:02Why on earth would Mercedes give its engine to its closest rival? Let’s not forget that Mercedes has comprehensively beat all its customer teams so the chassis can’t be all that bad.
Not in F1 till Toto started it. RB even had a Ferrari engine before they switched to Renault engines (even though there was a factory Renault team at the time)Csmith1980 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2022, 15:40Same goes for virtual any sports team or business, right.Alexf1 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2022, 15:11You're answering your own question. They only want to supply teams that are not close rivals.Csmith1980 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2022, 15:02
Why on earth would Mercedes give its engine to its closest rival? Let’s not forget that Mercedes has comprehensively beat all its customer teams so the chassis can’t be all that bad.
At the time they signed a contract with Renault, RedBull had one podium and no Adrian Newey.Alexf1 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2022, 16:43Not in F1 till Toto started it. RB even had a Ferrari engine before they switched to Renault engines (even though there was a factory Renault team at the time)
And no engine supply blocking between teamsJolle wrote: ↑24 Jan 2022, 16:55At the time they signed a contract with Renault, RedBull had one podium and no Adrian Newey.
Renault blocked McLaren getting their engines in 93, Briatore had to buy Liger to get their Renault contract for 95 and RedBull bought Minardi to get their hands on that Ferrari engine.