Hadjar and bearman are doing amazing work.
Verstappen is just on another planet all together.
I wonder if it will improve a bit when the noodle wings get clamped, right now it sucks.ringo wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:28
There would be no difference. These 2025 cars seem very poor for overtaking. Oscar would need to come within 0.3 seconds of Max to pass. What I think happens is that clean air in P-1 is more effective for the similarly paced cars to stay ahead. Redbull has pace, not a poor car by any means, but the clean air is probably making things look better than they are. Similar to Lewis winning the sprint.
Race is boring. No tyre deg and narrow track. Cool surface, so no overheating. Championship is tight. Max, Oscar, Lando, George.
The cars were bunched up and that killed the advantage of having two cars. Pitting one car first would work if it comes out into clean air. Then that car can delay the opponent then the 2nd place pits when there is a buffer to do the undercut. They just could not run that strategy today.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:10Severely mismanaged race by McLaren, looking like last year all over. Let Piastri have a go if Norris can’t.
The outcome might have been the same, but you always need to maximise your chances. It was clear Oscar was in a better position to mount a challenge, so it would have been the right thing to do. They could have tried, and switch back again in the end if it did not work. Zero to lose, very small chance of success. It’s an absolute no-brainer in that situation.ringo wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:28There would be no difference. These 2025 cars seem very poor for overtaking. Oscar would need to come within 0.3 seconds of Max to pass. What I think happens is that clean air in P-1 is more effective for the similarly paced cars to stay ahead. Redbull has pace, not a poor car by any means, but the clean air is probably making things look better than they are. Similar to Lewis winning the sprint.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:10Severely mismanaged race by McLaren, looking like last year all over. Let Piastri have a go if Norris can’t.
Race is boring. No tyre deg and narrow track. Cool surface, so no overheating. Championship is tight. Max, Oscar, Lando, George.
Kimi pit very late. fresher tires and lighter car.Sevach wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:30I wonder if it will improve a bit when the noodle wings get clamped, right now it sucks.ringo wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:28
There would be no difference. These 2025 cars seem very poor for overtaking. Oscar would need to come within 0.3 seconds of Max to pass. What I think happens is that clean air in P-1 is more effective for the similarly paced cars to stay ahead. Redbull has pace, not a poor car by any means, but the clean air is probably making things look better than they are. Similar to Lewis winning the sprint.
Race is boring. No tyre deg and narrow track. Cool surface, so no overheating. Championship is tight. Max, Oscar, Lando, George.
Antonelli youngest to have a fastest lap?
Yep. No idea, why they did not split strategies or at least go a bit more agressive. There was no danger from behind and pitting Norris on the lap they pitted Pia would have done the job.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:31The outcome might have been the same, but you always need to maximise your chances. It was clear Oscar was in a better position to mount a challenge, so it would have been the right thing to do. They could have tried, and switch back again in the end if it did not work. Zero to lose, very small chance of success. It’s an absolute no-brainer in that situation.ringo wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:28There would be no difference. These 2025 cars seem very poor for overtaking. Oscar would need to come within 0.3 seconds of Max to pass. What I think happens is that clean air in P-1 is more effective for the similarly paced cars to stay ahead. Redbull has pace, not a poor car by any means, but the clean air is probably making things look better than they are. Similar to Lewis winning the sprint.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:10Severely mismanaged race by McLaren, looking like last year all over. Let Piastri have a go if Norris can’t.
Race is boring. No tyre deg and narrow track. Cool surface, so no overheating. Championship is tight. Max, Oscar, Lando, George.
Doubt that. Hard tyre was slow to warm up so Max would've covered Norris the following lap, and deg wasn't really an issue which would have negated most of the advantage for Piastri if he went long.basti313 wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 09:03Yep. No idea, why they did not split strategies or at least go a bit more agressive. There was no danger from behind and pitting Norris on the lap they pitted Pia would have done the job.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:31The outcome might have been the same, but you always need to maximise your chances. It was clear Oscar was in a better position to mount a challenge, so it would have been the right thing to do. They could have tried, and switch back again in the end if it did not work. Zero to lose, very small chance of success. It’s an absolute no-brainer in that situation.ringo wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:28
There would be no difference. These 2025 cars seem very poor for overtaking. Oscar would need to come within 0.3 seconds of Max to pass. What I think happens is that clean air in P-1 is more effective for the similarly paced cars to stay ahead. Redbull has pace, not a poor car by any means, but the clean air is probably making things look better than they are. Similar to Lewis winning the sprint.
Race is boring. No tyre deg and narrow track. Cool surface, so no overheating. Championship is tight. Max, Oscar, Lando, George.
he would have dropped behind Piastri, so how could it have worked?IntrinsicVoid wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 09:26Most probably a later stop would work for Lando based on what we seen with Kimi and Hamilton, Hamilton with mediums got close on Kimi who was charging up his tyres. Considering the better car which is McLaren it would have been even easier than it was for Kimi.
Zero to lose for who? If Lando let's Oscar through, and Oscar does win. Lando loses loads of points.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:31The outcome might have been the same, but you always need to maximise your chances. It was clear Oscar was in a better position to mount a challenge, so it would have been the right thing to do. They could have tried, and switch back again in the end if it did not work. Zero to lose, very small chance of success. It’s an absolute no-brainer in that situation.ringo wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:28There would be no difference. These 2025 cars seem very poor for overtaking. Oscar would need to come within 0.3 seconds of Max to pass. What I think happens is that clean air in P-1 is more effective for the similarly paced cars to stay ahead. Redbull has pace, not a poor car by any means, but the clean air is probably making things look better than they are. Similar to Lewis winning the sprint.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 08:10Severely mismanaged race by McLaren, looking like last year all over. Let Piastri have a go if Norris can’t.
Race is boring. No tyre deg and narrow track. Cool surface, so no overheating. Championship is tight. Max, Oscar, Lando, George.
Regardless they would have tried something if they thought they had the pace. I just pointed a situation with tyre difference. 2-3 was guaranteed for them. I don’t understand, if the clean air was the king then why not at least try it.search wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 10:03he would have dropped behind Piastri, so how could it have worked?IntrinsicVoid wrote: ↑06 Apr 2025, 09:26Most probably a later stop would work for Lando based on what we seen with Kimi and Hamilton, Hamilton with mediums got close on Kimi who was charging up his tyres. Considering the better car which is McLaren it would have been even easier than it was for Kimi.