2014 cars

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
Giblet
Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: 2014 cars

Post

Honda ran that Front Tourque Transfer System and the car had axles up front linking the left and right together.

It was banned awfully quick so precedent is there and I can't imagine seeing a team attempt it.

http://www.f1network.net/main/s169/st58369.php
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: 2014 cars

Post

Giblet i think what was meant was two pairs solely for steering or propulsion. The Honda one would mean the fronts did propulsion AND steering
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

gridwalker
gridwalker
7
Joined: 27 Mar 2009, 12:22
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: 2014 cars

Post

scuderiafan wrote:
allstaruk08 wrote:"1.2 Automobile :
A land vehicle running on at least four non-aligned complete wheels, of which at least two are
used for steering and at least two for propulsion"

does that mean you can have 4 wheel drive and 4 wheel steer?
I would bet if a team decided to run a 4 wheel drive/steering system, they could use it and say the regs allow it.
I think that this provision is in place to future-proof this particular regulation against future electrification of the drive train. It was only a few years ago that the the ill-fated cost cap regulations contained a provision for 4 wheel KERS. Although that isn't in the 2014 regulations, it can only be a matter of time before it is introduced.

I believe that 2 wheel drive is specified in the transmission regulations, but the transmission rules will need to be redefined before further electrification of the drive train can take place. Adding a provision for the minimum number of driven wheels in a separate clause will mean that it is easier to completely rewrite the transmission regulations when 4wK is introduced.

Just my 2 cents.
"Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine ..."

User avatar
Tozza Mazza
1
Joined: 13 Jan 2011, 12:00
Location: UK

Re: 2014 cars

Post

QUESTION:

in 2014, will the front wing's be allowed to be endplateless, or are we going to get a boring flat endplate design?
Article 3.7.5
Ahead of the front wheel centre line and between 750mm and 825mm from the car centre line there must be bodywork with a projected area of no less than 95,000mm2 in side view. Any intersection of this bodywork with a lateral vertical plane or a horizontal plane must form one continuous line.

User avatar
aleks_ader
90
Joined: 28 Jul 2011, 08:40

Re: 2014 cars

Post

Tozza Mazza wrote:QUESTION:

in 2014, will the front wing's be allowed to be endplateless, or are we going to get a boring flat endplate design?
Article 3.7.5
Ahead of the front wheel centre line and between 750mm and 825mm from the car centre line there must be bodywork with a projected area of no less than 95,000mm2 in side view. Any intersection of this bodywork with a lateral vertical plane or a horizontal plane must form one continuous line.
Yes i m quite sure beacuse that rules in 2014 are just reajustmend of curend rules!
"And if you no longer go for a gap that exists, you're no longer a racing driver..." Ayrton Senna

User avatar
Tozza Mazza
1
Joined: 13 Jan 2011, 12:00
Location: UK

Re: 2014 cars

Post

The changes are pretty major actually!

There's also nothing in the regs 'THAT I CAN FIND' which mandates a lower nose tip.

I'm working on a 2014 F1 Front wing at the moment, but before I start I need to know about this regulation in question!

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: 2014 cars

Post

The main area that i will enjoy seeing is the front wings coming in from 1.8meters to 1.6 meters and loosing those god damn awful cascade wings. Also the nose rules will be diffrent with the lower tub not being allowed to exceed a certain maximum height to make them look like the BGP001 in effect and get rid of that damned nose hump we will have this year..

The beam wing being gone will also provide less downforce as well, but minimal.

The cars wont change too much cosmetically to the eye, but will change massivly internaly with KERS/HERS systems for 30 seconds a lap and the 15,000rpm limited V6 Turbos with tuned exhaust notes.

I recon that the fuel flow rate limit will also make designers go for more slippery cars, almost to the cost of having downforce, they will actually make the car faster arround a track by having less. This means they can have a smaller fuel tank as well, cutting even more of those thenths and hundreths off a laptime.

Id also expect DRS rules to also change by then to drivers having only say 10 or 20 pushes in a specific DRS straight or straights on some tracks. Id also expect DRS to last at maximum 700m for a DRS zone on those straights.

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: 2014 cars

Post

ESPImperium wrote:The cars wont change too much cosmetically to the eye, but will change massivly internaly with KERS/HERS systems for 30 seconds a lap and the 15,000rpm limited V6 Turbos with tuned exhaust notes.
I have already pointed out in this thread that the KERS system will not be continued. There will be no push button for a timed release of electric energy to the rear wheels as we have seen with KERS. Instead the electric energy from the battery will be continuously fed in by pushing the throttle pedal. Electric energy from the hybrid turbo charger is expected to be fed to the rear wheel motor/generator (MGUK) at the rate it is produced by the turbo chargers motor/generator (MGUH).

The 15,000 rpm limit will be largely decorative. Beyond 10,500 rpm upwards the fuel flow will be level at 27.78 g/s which means that peak power is reached under 11,000 rpm. There will be no motivation to run between 11 and 15 krpm as friction will reduce the power continually with rising rpm. On the other hand sound will nevertheless be impressive as all six cylinders will be firing into one exhaust pipe. So the frequency that you hear will be coming from both banks instead of one bank that we used to hear from the V12s, the V10s and the V8s.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

User avatar
aleks_ader
90
Joined: 28 Jul 2011, 08:40

Re: 2014 cars

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:
ESPImperium wrote:The cars wont change too much cosmetically to the eye, but will change massivly internaly with KERS/HERS systems for 30 seconds a lap and the 15,000rpm limited V6 Turbos with tuned exhaust notes.
I have already pointed out in this thread that the KERS system will not be continued. There will be no push button for a timed release of electric energy to the rear wheels as we have seen with KERS. Instead the electric energy from the battery will be continuously fed in by pushing the throttle pedal. Electric energy from the hybrid turbo charger is expected to be fed to the rear wheel motor/generator (MGUK) at the rate it is produced by the turbo chargers motor/generator (MGUH).

The 15,000 rpm limit will be largely decorative. Beyond 10,500 rpm upwards the fuel flow will be level at 27.78 g/s which means that peak power is reached under 11,000 rpm. There will be no motivation to run between 11 and 15 krpm as friction will reduce the power continually with rising rpm. On the other hand sound will nevertheless be impressive as all six cylinders will be firing into one exhaust pipe. So the frequency that you hear will be coming from both banks instead of one bank that we used to hear from the V12s, the V10s and the V8s.
And mehanical Mguk..kers there will be two sources of energy input Mguk (nawadays kers) and mguh (that electro turbo motor)
"And if you no longer go for a gap that exists, you're no longer a racing driver..." Ayrton Senna

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: 2014 cars

Post

aleksandergreat wrote:
WhiteBlue wrote:
ESPImperium wrote:The cars wont change too much cosmetically to the eye, but will change massivly internaly with KERS/HERS systems for 30 seconds a lap and the 15,000rpm limited V6 Turbos with tuned exhaust notes.
I have already pointed out in this thread that the KERS system will not be continued. There will be no push button for a timed release of electric energy to the rear wheels as we have seen with KERS. Instead the electric energy from the battery will be continuously fed in by pushing the throttle pedal. Electric energy from the hybrid turbo charger is expected to be fed to the rear wheel motor/generator (MGUK) at the rate it is produced by the turbo chargers motor/generator (MGUH).

The 15,000 rpm limit will be largely decorative. Beyond 10,500 rpm upwards the fuel flow will be level at 27.78 g/s which means that peak power is reached under 11,000 rpm. There will be no motivation to run between 11 and 15 krpm as friction will reduce the power continually with rising rpm. On the other hand sound will nevertheless be impressive as all six cylinders will be firing into one exhaust pipe. So the frequency that you hear will be coming from both banks instead of one bank that we used to hear from the V12s, the V10s and the V8s.
And mehanical Mguk..kers there will be two sources of energy input Mguk (nawadays kers) and mguh (that electro turbo motor)
All true, as well as that there is scope for the turbo to have a MGU on it as well, charging when spinning when the throttle is depressed, but also keeping it spinning when the throttle isnt depressed. I thought there was also going to be a KERS button as to give the driver the option to boost in order to overtake if he needed.

Also the 8 speed gearbox will be new, where each of the 4 allowable gearboxes will have their ratios locked in for the season, with only final drive allowed to be altered on 4 occasions during the season.

The only thing that is rumored to be kept the same, McLaren Electronics are to keep the supply of the SECU, whitch will save costs to the teams. However, some teams have enquired to see if there is any way for a new display for the drivers as there is teams that want a segment for the driver to know when the ERS are charging and not, and how much the batteries have charged.

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: 2014 cars

Post

ESPImperium wrote:All true, as well as that there is scope for the turbo to have a MGU on it as well, charging when spinning when the throttle is depressed, but also keeping it spinning when the throttle isnt depressed.
#-o Please read what others have posted about the MGUH. Your posts about the issue are confusing and misleading.
ESPImperium wrote:I thought there was also going to be a KERS button as to give the driver the option to boost in order to overtake if he needed.
Definitely NOT!!!!!
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

User avatar
Tozza Mazza
1
Joined: 13 Jan 2011, 12:00
Location: UK

Re: 2014 cars

Post

Are endplateless front wings and cascade wings banned for '14?

I can't find anything banning the cascades, but a rule which bans endplatesless wings :?

User avatar
MIKEY_!
7
Joined: 10 Jul 2011, 03:07

Re: 2014 cars

Post

Why would they ban endplateless front wings??? Also I forget, are they reducing the width of the FW to pre-2009 levels.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: 2014 cars

Post

Mikey; I think what Tozza is referring to is the endplate-less design that cars such as the BGP-001 and F1.09 employed.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
N12ck
11
Joined: 19 Dec 2010, 19:10

Re: 2014 cars

Post

Can anyone point me to the regulation telling us the maximum height of the nose tip, as the dimensions I have drawn out according to regulations doesn't look low enough to be a '2014 nose' (I am following the regulations), does anyone know the specific regulation which decides the nose tip height :D
Cheers
Nick
Budding F1 Engineer