I agree with your fundamental reasoning of it, but if real records are not kept, how will we know which is the most effective treatments and procedures? Someone (and I use the word as number is just too sterile) dies from a stroke while being treated for Covid, the record and statistic used to determine what is to become standard practice will not be based on fact, but assumption.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑08 Apr 2020, 17:22I still say lump them in the pile because they might have gotten better treatment if the Corona wasn't clogging up the pipelines! So what I'm saying even if they indirectly died of it... It balances out those that really died of it and weren't tested. Heck, If the stock market crashes tomorrow and some CEO dies of heart attack I would lump that in too! Ha.Big Tea wrote: ↑08 Apr 2020, 16:58It depends on how important the numbers are considered. I prefer to see actual numbers but I supose it makes no difference to those concerned, as long as everyone uses the same system.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑08 Apr 2020, 16:49
Do people actually care? If you die with it before it killed you, it would have killed you later anyway.
Those without Covid could have died anyway
Seriously though.. With these things it goes into your percentage of error. With the mayem in the hospitals is not worth a doctor's time to comb out Covid symptoms from some other disease. Even if that patient was not tested postive and he showed Covid symptoms before he died... i would lump him in too.