LionsHeart wrote: ↑01 Mar 2024, 22:51Drag? Unbelievable. And I thought I wouldn't see this problem this season.
https://i.ibb.co/N2w0x1K/61-A0-D25-C-55 ... 3-AB81.png
We have higher downforce Rear Wing...
LionsHeart wrote: ↑01 Mar 2024, 22:51Drag? Unbelievable. And I thought I wouldn't see this problem this season.
https://i.ibb.co/N2w0x1K/61-A0-D25-C-55 ... 3-AB81.png
BMMR61 wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 04:13Speaking as the realistic optimist.....
I refrained from getting hysterical through the testing, refrained from being downcast from the avalanche of negative media talk.... only slightly worried by the Lando talk.
My expectations before the MCL38 hit the track were that McLaren would significantly lower the gap to Red Bull, and eliminate weekends that were off the pace, and to see Oscar greatly improve his race management. For this weekend if I were told we would qualify 7th and 8th I'd have been slightly disappointed. Taking in that it was Bahrain would have lessened the blow, but seeing the closeness of the top 10 and taking account of the errors, I think we are in really good shape for the season to fight for 2nd place.
I think the speed traps and the sector two times are potentially predictive of decent race pace and tyre degradation. With expected 2 stop strategy being the norm, there is plenty of chance to jump some drivers in front. Both drivers in top 6 would be my hope.
Further to this, they mentioned on Sky F1 (might have been Ted's Notebook I'm not sure) that they won't be bringing the first major upgrade until after Miami, the implication being that they could bring it earlier but don't want to, as they don't want to introduce it at one of the Sprint weekends with only 1 Practice session.f1rules wrote: ↑01 Mar 2024, 17:02some interesting bits during fp3 about updates
https://www.mclaren.com/racing/formula- ... rand-prix/
Beyond this, there’s generally a further update planned for the summer months, often incorporating real-world data from the launch car, and perhaps a further update to come after the summer break. As the season goes on, the size and frequency of updates becomes question of balancing resource allocation. For a team locked in a tough fight for championship position, there’s a desire to keep improving the car – but any resources still dedicated to it are resources not being used on the next car. This tends to provide some fairly robust conversations in the summer months.
#THEFIFTHDRIVER
14:29
The minute the launch spec is frozen, the design team turns its attention to the first update. In the past, when winter testing would go on for a couple of months, that update might arrive for race one, with a second update scheduled to arrive when the teams arrived in Europe after the first set of flyaway races. That’s changed a bit with launch and race one only a week apart, so the first round of updates, having already been designed before the cars have turned a wheel, arriving four or five races into the season.
#THEFIFTHDRIVER
14:28
Designing these updates is an on-going project, with nominal release dates pencilled-in to the calendar well in advance of the season starting. The car will go through a series of design freezes. Manufacturing is a long lead-time job, dominated by skilled craftspeople rather than automation (though there’s quite a bit of that too). Thus, the launch spec of the MCL38 will have been frozen towards the end of 2023, to give the manufacturing operation time to produce the launch cars and an appropriate number of spares.
#THEFIFTHDRIVER
14:28
Beyond that, there are the genuine updates. There are different ways of defining these, but a good rule of thumb is that they alter the car to the point where the new and the old configurations aren’t interchangeable – e.g. the floor for a B-spec car can’t be fitted to the launch model.
He said the car felt off compared practice after quali yesterday, so I doubt it.
It really did not make a lot of sense to be honest, since both MCL36 and MCL60 (until Austria) were quite poor. Interesting thing is that drag still isn't resolved to the extent it should be at this point, but last year they didn't seem to harvest at all on SF straight, probably in anticipation of a race with a lot of overtakes. Overall, MCL38 is an improvement everywhere, but mostly in medium and high speed sections - as expected.101FlyingDutchman wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 13:09Could I trouble you for a MCL comparison? Suppose it’s not really a fair one as the BAH MCL60 was a dog compared to the one introduced at Silverstone
Thank you my friend. The straight line speed difference may be because of tow in ‘23. It looks too big a gap to make senseVanja #66 wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 13:33It really did not make a lot of sense to be honest, since both MCL36 and MCL60 (until Austria) were quite poor. Interesting thing is that drag still isn't resolved to the extent it should be at this point, but last year they didn't seem to harvest at all on SF straight, probably in anticipation of a race with a lot of overtakes. Overall, MCL38 is an improvement everywhere, but mostly in medium and high speed sections - as expected.101FlyingDutchman wrote: ↑02 Mar 2024, 13:09Could I trouble you for a MCL comparison? Suppose it’s not really a fair one as the BAH MCL60 was a dog compared to the one introduced at Silverstone
https://i.ibb.co/fdWGLjk/mcl.jpg