Renault R31

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
reikorp
reikorp
0
Joined: 28 Jan 2011, 10:09

Re: Renault R31

Post

Image


Here's a photo of the new R31 :lol: I've heard there's literally gold in paint, even in black. Hope it's a form of self-fulfilling prophecy [-o<

User avatar
forty-two
0
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 21:07

Re: Renault R31

Post

reikorp wrote:I've heard there's literally gold in paint, even in black.
In a sport where every gram is scraped off the car in the interests of weight saving, surely flakes of gold in the paintwork would be a rather odd move?
The answer to the ultimate question, of life, the Universe and ... Everything?

thestig84
thestig84
10
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 13:09

Re: Renault R31

Post

forty-two wrote:
reikorp wrote:I've heard there's literally gold in paint, even in black.
In a sport where every gram is scraped off the car in the interests of weight saving, surely flakes of gold in the paintwork would be a rather odd move?
Quite the opposite. Extract from James Allen blog about Renault livery.

"One of the advantages of having a black car is that you need less layers of paint to cover it than a white car, so you save weight, probably worth up to half a tenth of a second per lap. Painting an F1 car white, requires three or four layers and uses around 4 kilos of paint. A black car needs only one base layer and one top coat, so saves around 30% of paint. At a race like Barcelona in pure performance terms that equates to four seconds over a 66 lap race, although the cars have to hit a minimum weight, it still confers a saving."

Also Im quite sure it is gold paint mixed with the black not actual gold.

djones
djones
20
Joined: 17 Mar 2005, 15:01

Re: Renault R31

Post

0.050 seconds for 1.2 kg (30% of 4kg) weight?

Also its not taking into account a minimum weight so there isnt really a saving.

Sounds like typical James Allen BS to me.

Sukhoi
Sukhoi
1
Joined: 28 Jan 2011, 21:24

Re: Renault R31

Post

Hello everyone :P
Image
Image

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: Renault R31

Post

Hello. You've taken this photos from a video ?

manchild
manchild
12
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 10:54

Re: Renault R31

Post

I guess someone was secretly taking photos or filming first fire-up. Those photos are not available on LRGP site or tweeter.

Got some more? :lol:

Neno
Neno
-29
Joined: 31 May 2010, 01:41

Re: Renault R31

Post

This airbox on pictures looks like R30 airbox after Spa and f-duct?! http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_xSlRgVbVSoY/T ... 010-21.jpg
Is this on pictures R30 in 2011 colors or R31?

Sukhoi
Sukhoi
1
Joined: 28 Jan 2011, 21:24

Re: Renault R31

Post

Blackout wrote:Hello. You've taken this photos from a video ?

Yes , from that video on LRGP twitter

here link : http://www.kyte.tv/ch/lotusrenault-gp-f ... 5&l=218371

H.Lyoud
H.Lyoud
0
Joined: 17 May 2010, 08:34

Re: Renault R31

Post

As i expected they will launch an hybrid.

thestig84
thestig84
10
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 13:09

Re: Renault R31

Post

djones wrote:0.050 seconds for 1.2 kg (30% of 4kg) weight?

Also its not taking into account a minimum weight so there isnt really a saving.

Sounds like typical James Allen BS to me.
What? Did you read the quote?!? Read the last sentence again. I am well aware of the minimum weight.
although the cars have to hit a minimum weight, it still confers a saving.
Why would teams constantly look to save weight throughout the season. Check Mclarens list of upgrades over the season, a lot of weight saving in there. Fair enough the maths may not be spot on but it was from Renault not James Allen.

I think the premise is sound enough. You just pile on the paint till you hit that minimum weight, who needs ballast!?

djones
djones
20
Joined: 17 Mar 2005, 15:01

Re: Renault R31

Post

Just for the record I'm not having a go at you - just JA exaggerating the importance of something.

User avatar
forty-two
0
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 21:07

Re: Renault R31

Post

thestig84 wrote:I think the premise is sound enough. You just pile on the paint till you hit that minimum weight, who needs ballast!?
This reminds me, last year I took my daughter to Mercedes Benz world, where they have loads of stuff for kids to look at, presumably to keep them occupied while dad is looking at the flash cars.

One of the things I learnt was that the famous "Silver Arrow" which Mercedes entered when they first won the WC was bizzarely subject to a maximum weight limit, so in order to reduce the weight of their car, they removed the paint in order to get the weight down. There's actually a touch-screen there where kids can "scratch" the paint of a picture of a car while a number in the corner representing the weight decreases.

I think that this later contributed to the intensity of the fire at the famous crash at Le-Mans, because had the magnesium been painted it would have been slightly less likely to burst into flames.

A touch off topic, but I thought it was interesting!
The answer to the ultimate question, of life, the Universe and ... Everything?

User avatar
H. Zedozil
0
Joined: 29 Dec 2010, 04:42
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Renault R31

Post

R31 shark fin and the rear wing

Image

User avatar
mith
0
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 18:03
Location: Wrocław, Poland

Re: Renault R31

Post

H. Zedozil wrote:R31 shark fin and the rear wing
It's taken from that teaser film and it's R30. I was watching it several times yesterday, pausing after each 2-3 seconds and I am 99,9% sure that all images, beside the one shot at engine lunch are made with R30. It's the same also for the CFD model, shown there (but actually it was nice to see it, as it has W wing on it with flow lines attached, so one can get idea how does it work).

It's not long until we'll see the real thing, so we'll be soon able to verify my statement, but as I said, I'm almost completely sure, we saw R30 in LRGP new livery in that teaser.
Last edited by mith on 29 Jan 2011, 15:49, edited 1 time in total.