"We need to get you weighed after"Just_a_fan wrote:Charlie and Seb having a chat there?
"I did already at the weigh bridge 69.0kg"
- Login or Register
No account yet? Sign up
Lewis Hamilton completed a faultless Mexican Grand Prix to take the win unthreatened. Nico Rosberg did get under fire from time to time, but held it together to finish second. Vettel completed the podium following a penalty for Verstappen, although he too was later demoted, handing the remaining podium position to Daniel Ricciardo.
"We need to get you weighed after"Just_a_fan wrote:Charlie and Seb having a chat there?
there is that thing called track, its the black bit in between the white lines, and you, as a driver, are expected to drive on that thing, not cut corners as you like and do the same normal lap timesShrieker wrote:Some1 explain why Ves was penalised. Vettel wasn't even alongside for good measure. How exactly can Ferrari claim that place ? Just because of better tires and DRS ? LOL.
WHAT A JOKE.
If Max didn't get penalised for his moves under braking; there is no way in hell Vettel will be penalised.Shrieker wrote:Surely Vettel must be penalised as well he clearly moved under braking and hardcore squeezed Ric.
There was a rule clarification after Japan that you must've missed. The inconsistency of rule application from FIA is staggering to say the least.SameSame wrote:If Max didn't get penalised for his moves under braking; there is no way in hell Vettel will be penalised.Shrieker wrote:Surely Vettel must be penalised as well he clearly moved under braking and hardcore squeezed Ric.
Then every off track excursion that gave an advantage should've been penalised. Which is surely not the case.jz11 wrote:there is that thing called track, its the black bit in between the white lines, and you, as a driver, are expected to drive on that thing, not cut corners as you like and do the same normal lap timesShrieker wrote:Some1 explain why Ves was penalised. Vettel wasn't even alongside for good measure. How exactly can Ferrari claim that place ? Just because of better tires and DRS ? LOL.
WHAT A JOKE.
if there wouldn't be this penalty, this drive-to-delta-taxi-f1 would have become a total joke
I must have missed that. But agreed, the FIA is more inconsistent than most soccer ref's.Shrieker wrote:There was a rule clarification after Japan that you must've missed. The inconsistency of rule application from FIA is staggering to say the least.SameSame wrote:If Max didn't get penalised for his moves under braking; there is no way in hell Vettel will be penalised.Shrieker wrote:Surely Vettel must be penalised as well he clearly moved under braking and hardcore squeezed Ric.
one must be VES fanboy to even begin to argue against that 5sec penaltyShrieker wrote:Then every of track excursion that gave an advantage should've been penalised. Which is surely not the case.jz11 wrote:there is that thing called track, its the black bit in between the white lines, and you, as a driver, are expected to drive on that thing, not cut corners as you like and do the same normal lap timesShrieker wrote:Some1 explain why Ves was penalised. Vettel wasn't even alongside for good measure. How exactly can Ferrari claim that place ? Just because of better tires and DRS ? LOL.
WHAT A JOKE.
if there wouldn't be this penalty, this drive-to-delta-taxi-f1 would have become a total joke
Max crowded Nico off the track.mrluke wrote:Why did Ves:Vet end in a penalty when Ves:Ros didnt?
Ves cut to keep ahead of vettel, ros had nowhere to go and was ahead before the incident.mrluke wrote:Why did Ves:Vet end in a penalty when Ves:Ros didnt?