i think they are the 7th best team behinddamager21 wrote:Speed trap in all 3 sectors are comparable to Mercedes
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cd4fyPOWAAALrSP.jpg
My guess is that we are the 6th best team behind
1. Mercedes
2. Ferrari
3. Torro Rosso
4. Williams
5. Red Bull
We are on par with Force India. Going by McLaren's in season development pace, we should be able to beat Williams and catch up with Torro Rosso. End of the year we can end up being the 4th best team behind setting up for a good 2017
1. Mercedes
2. Ferrari
3. Red Bull
Also, current gap after FP3 is 1.6secs to Mercedes. I would have expected a gap of max 1.2 secs. Last year we were about 2.2 secs behind Mercedes. If we managed to recover 0.6 secs by fixing ERS issue, I would have expected minimum 0.4 secs more from PU and chassis.
I hope there is more to come in the coming races.
davidfroshanzen wrote:i think they are the 7th best team behinddamager21 wrote:Speed trap in all 3 sectors are comparable to Mercedes
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cd4fyPOWAAALrSP.jpg
My guess is that we are the 6th best team behind
1. Mercedes
2. Ferrari
3. Torro Rosso
4. Williams
5. Red Bull
We are on par with Force India. Going by McLaren's in season development pace, we should be able to beat Williams and catch up with Torro Rosso. End of the year we can end up being the 4th best team behind setting up for a good 2017
1. Mercedes
2. Ferrari
3. Red Bull
Also, current gap after FP3 is 1.6secs to Mercedes. I would have expected a gap of max 1.2 secs. Last year we were about 2.2 secs behind Mercedes. If we managed to recover 0.6 secs by fixing ERS issue, I would have expected minimum 0.4 secs more from PU and chassis.
I hope there is more to come in the coming races.
1. Mercedes
2. Ferrari
3. Torro Rosso
4. Williams
5. Red Bull
6. FI
The merc qualifying mode is great isnt it? lol .... would have loved to see the Ferraris and torro rossos do a second lap which more than likely would have been an improvement of their times set earlier. and a better indication of what the gap really isJuzh wrote:Mercedes engine as savage as it has always been.
maximum speeds:
http://www.fia.com/file/39468/download?token=WWyZ_uLS
speed trap:
http://www.fia.com/file/39469/download?token=u_wuGyD7
giantfan10 wrote:The merc qualifying mode is great isnt it? lol .... would have loved to see the Ferraris and torro rossos do a second lap which more than likely would have been an improvement of their times set earlier. and a better indication of what the gap really isJuzh wrote:Mercedes engine as savage as it has always been.
maximum speeds:
http://www.fia.com/file/39468/download?token=WWyZ_uLS
speed trap:
http://www.fia.com/file/39469/download?token=u_wuGyD7
And who's saying they werent? Are you high?GPR-A wrote:giantfan10 wrote:The merc qualifying mode is great isnt it? lol .... would have loved to see the Ferraris and torro rossos do a second lap which more than likely would have been an improvement of their times set earlier. and a better indication of what the gap really isJuzh wrote:Mercedes engine as savage as it has always been.
maximum speeds:
http://www.fia.com/file/39468/download?token=WWyZ_uLS
speed trap:
http://www.fia.com/file/39469/download?token=u_wuGyD7![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Stop blaming the qualifying format. It was the same for everyone. THEY WERE SIMPLY SLOWER THAN MERCEDES.
Obviously.Juzh wrote:And who's saying they werent? Are you high?GPR-A wrote:giantfan10 wrote: The merc qualifying mode is great isnt it? lol .... would have loved to see the Ferraris and torro rossos do a second lap which more than likely would have been an improvement of their times set earlier. and a better indication of what the gap really is![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Stop blaming the qualifying format. It was the same for everyone. THEY WERE SIMPLY SLOWER THAN MERCEDES.
This sounds great imho.nim_peter wrote:Old format, remove the 100kg/hr fuel limit in qualifying, we have a winner. Will be super exciting, we might have engine blowouts if teams push beyond limits. There is a penalty with engine life as well, the more you push.
ok we all get it the driver you are a fan of is on pole so there is nothing wrong with qualifying from your view. i want to be entertained... i want all cars out on track in Q3 with new tires in the last 2 minutes of the session , engines turned up eeking out that last tenth trying to get on pole and if the driver i'm a fan of doesnt get on pole then i say he tried and the car wasnt fast enough or whatever not 6 out of the top 8 just saying bleep it if we go out to make a banzai run for pole we will have no fresh supersofts left so lets focus on the race. It also just so happens that 9 times out of ten most of the cars improve their times with their last flying lap because the track is continuosly improving and they find time frome where the sun doesnt shine i guess lol.diego.liv wrote:Where are those asking for just gravel traps? Those asking for the one lap qualifying? If the aim of this format is to punish driver errors, that worked fine..not anybody's fault if you need three different runs to pass the cut