This is probably the most likely scenario. But you cannot scoff at the negativity here when the team itself has no confidence to share with their fans. I don't see how they could expect a different reaction when they are so downbeat before the car has even hit the track.haza wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 13:09All this negativity and a wheel hasn’t even turned I wouldn’t at all be surprised if McLaren are just being cautious with their words remember Barcelona tests last year an how it went from optimism to heart break come the Bahrain test, I reckon there just playing safe to not build expectations like last year
I think some fans are reading out of context and ignoring the other reports of optimism regarding the upgrades.Emag wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 13:30This is probably the most likely scenario. But you cannot scoff at the negativity here when the team itself has no confidence to share with their fans. I don't see how they could expect a different reaction when they are so downbeat before the car has even hit the track.haza wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 13:09All this negativity and a wheel hasn’t even turned I wouldn’t at all be surprised if McLaren are just being cautious with their words remember Barcelona tests last year an how it went from optimism to heart break come the Bahrain test, I reckon there just playing safe to not build expectations like last year
Yes, it could be that they want to underpromise and overdeliver after last year's disaster start to the season. But even so, the fact that they have to resort to this sort of tactic to keep the fans happy when the season starts is not an attitude I would endorse.
They have been bullish about their investments and team restructure since 2019. Now that we are nearing the deadlines of their own predictions for bringing McLaren to the front, people would be expecting results. The fact that they went backwards last year after consecutive improvements is not a good sign. And not having confidence in your own technical capabilities to develop a car that is good enough to beat the midfield after making predictions of actually fighting for the championship within the next two seasons is also not a good sign.
You don't see Mercedes, RedBull and Ferrari display that lack of confidence, because if you are certain of your abilities, you should not be scared of others pulling an "one-up" on you.
Like I always say, you don't know what you don't know!Ground Effect wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 13:57I think some fans are reading out of context and ignoring the other reports of optimism regarding the upgrades.Emag wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 13:30This is probably the most likely scenario. But you cannot scoff at the negativity here when the team itself has no confidence to share with their fans. I don't see how they could expect a different reaction when they are so downbeat before the car has even hit the track.haza wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 13:09All this negativity and a wheel hasn’t even turned I wouldn’t at all be surprised if McLaren are just being cautious with their words remember Barcelona tests last year an how it went from optimism to heart break come the Bahrain test, I reckon there just playing safe to not build expectations like last year
Yes, it could be that they want to underpromise and overdeliver after last year's disaster start to the season. But even so, the fact that they have to resort to this sort of tactic to keep the fans happy when the season starts is not an attitude I would endorse.
They have been bullish about their investments and team restructure since 2019. Now that we are nearing the deadlines of their own predictions for bringing McLaren to the front, people would be expecting results. The fact that they went backwards last year after consecutive improvements is not a good sign. And not having confidence in your own technical capabilities to develop a car that is good enough to beat the midfield after making predictions of actually fighting for the championship within the next two seasons is also not a good sign.
You don't see Mercedes, RedBull and Ferrari display that lack of confidence, because if you are certain of your abilities, you should not be scared of others pulling an "one-up" on you.
So we are happy, not entirely happy for what is the launch car, but optimistic that we should take a good step soon."
To be honest, that doesn't sound downbeat to me.
Like I said before, I think while we are happy with the development of the car in most of the areas, there's some areas in which we kind of realised a little late in development, some really strong directions.
This doesn't sound downbeat either, simply cautious and realistic.
Agreed, the negativity on here is pretty bizarre. So much doom and gloom and the car hasn't even seen a track yet, lmao. Only thing that's reasonable to be upset with so far is the livery, which is 2017 levels of bad. What were they thinking...haza wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 13:09All this negativity and a wheel hasn’t even turned I wouldn’t at all be surprised if McLaren are just being cautious with their words remember Barcelona tests last year an how it went from optimism to heart break come the Bahrain test, I reckon there just playing safe to not build expectations like last year
Summed it up perfectly.Ground Effect wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 08:16Andreas never said the upgrade is to address any issue.swifteddie1 wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 07:16I hope I am wrong, but its all a little troubling.
The general mood in the team at the launch was that they aren't where they want to be and hope an upgrade in Baku will address their issues. Baku is in 2.5 months.
James Key as far as I can tell was no where at the launch.
8 of 10 teams have run a shakedown with McLaren and Haas the only ones not to. Yes, a shakedown will not uncover every issue with the car, but it will certainly help you work out any little niggles with the new car.
Something doesn't seem right, but i really hope i am wrong.
Either way I will be cheering for the team this year and hoping for the best.
As for what the MCL60 can deliver, he added: “In terms of performance expectations, we remain realistic for the short-term. We will see where we are in Bahrain at the test and at the first race. Independently of that, we have good developments in the pipeline, so we remain optimistic for the season ahead.”
The above is from F1.com. From other quotes, it just appears that the team discovered a good development path, but too late in the day to incorporate it in the launch spec, so it'll come with the first upgrade of the season. So the not "entirely happy" remark seems to be about tangible performance left on the table that could have made it to Bahrain. This could be a legacy of the ibrake issues that affected the pace of development of the 2023 car, as Seidl said last year that development started a bit late.
These are Stella's comments during the launch.
Pushed on where he anticipated McLaren to be at the start of the year, Stella suggested that it was impossible to know what rivals had produced.
However, he said that it would be wrong to be too optimistic if the team already knew it was giving performance away.
"It is always difficult to translate what you see over the winter in terms of development to where you're going to be in terms of pecking order," he said. "But we try to relate this to ourselves.
"Like I said before, I think while we are happy with the development of the car in most of the areas, there's some areas in which we kind of realised a little late in development, some really strong directions. So not necessarily we have been able to capitalise on this direction in the very short term.
I watched the video with Craig, I believe he is been a bit rough on his analysis (I believe there was even mention that McLaren also copied RB’s suspension, when that is definitely not the case)… After every car has debuted, there is clearly 3 potential “concepts” that seem to work well… You can have an undercut, you can have a tub (or a mix of both) or you can have “tiny pods”… Because RB, Ferrari and Mercedes were as expected the top 3 last season, any attempt to go for any of the philosophies, will automatically label you a copy of (insert here depending on your concept)… We’ve gotten to the point that even teams that arguably are doing their own thing (undercut + tub / ramps) are said to be copying both Ferrari and RB.BMMR61 wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 13:01Craig Scarborough (Scarbs) reckons the MCL60 is a fundamental shift and an attempt to copy last season’s Red Bull. He foresees problems getting the car sufficiently developed as other copied designs Racing Point?) have in the past, which gels with some of the comments from Andreas. So, do we go into 2023 with a fundamentally different concept which the team will have to learn to develop?
On the low key statements coming from the team I would not be concerned at all, even if the car ain’t great out of the box. Bragging can be a burden to bear, low key is fine by me. Obviously if the team performed at Bahrain like last year I’d be disappointed but the team bounced back pretty quickly. The longer term issues were the fundamental flaws of the car, so from that perspective it’s probably a good thing to be making fundamental design concept changes.
You clearly haven’t watched the Mercedes launch and listened to Toto then… No assurances of fighting at the frontEmag wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 13:30This is probably the most likely scenario. But you cannot scoff at the negativity here when the team itself has no confidence to share with their fans. I don't see how they could expect a different reaction when they are so downbeat before the car has even hit the track.haza wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 13:09All this negativity and a wheel hasn’t even turned I wouldn’t at all be surprised if McLaren are just being cautious with their words remember Barcelona tests last year an how it went from optimism to heart break come the Bahrain test, I reckon there just playing safe to not build expectations like last year
Yes, it could be that they want to underpromise and overdeliver after last year's disaster start to the season. But even so, the fact that they have to resort to this sort of tactic to keep the fans happy when the season starts is not an attitude I would endorse.
They have been bullish about their investments and team restructure since 2019. Now that we are nearing the deadlines of their own predictions for bringing McLaren to the front, people would be expecting results. The fact that they went backwards last year after consecutive improvements is not a good sign. And not having confidence in your own technical capabilities to develop a car that is good enough to beat the midfield after making predictions of actually fighting for the championship within the next two seasons is also not a good sign.
You don't see Mercedes, RedBull and Ferrari display that lack of confidence, because if you are certain of your abilities, you should not be scared of others pulling an "one-up" on you.
There were new rules and they made the wrong decisions on the initial aerodynamic concept, and now have gradually adopted an Alpine-style car (for some reason in multiple steps, instead of going there directly like Aston Martin did or starting with "a more correct"^ down washing concept like Alpine did in the first place). Only time will tell if James Key at McLaren can do better than Pat Fry at Alpine or Dan Fallows at Aston Martin, and thus whether McLaren made the right decision to select Key in preference to Fry or Fallows.
What caused McLaren to miss the mark with their 2022 launch car? Was it a simple lack of a proper target for the required downforce level? Deficiencies in component design, modelling and simulation, causing the brake miscalculation and other issues like the lack of front grip and (supposed) inconsistent centre-of-pressure?Ground Effect wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 08:16This could be a legacy of the ibrake issues that affected the pace of development of the 2023 car, as Seidl said last year that development started a bit late.
Also don’t forget, Seidl is the CEO now at Sauber/ Audi effectively doing the job Zak does for Mclaren. I wouldn’t see it as Seidl jumping ship but more like getting a pay riseDGP123 wrote: ↑07 Feb 2023, 12:27As Seidl said last year, McLaren are a couple of years off. He’s now left, which says everything you need to know. If there was something exciting to stick around for, he’d still be there. Zak stated the team would not see the benefit of the new wind tunnel until 2025 either.
Unfortunately, I can’t see McLaren making any real progress this year. The top 3 are miles ahead.
Zak (or was it Stella?) said recently that new windtunnel will be online mid-2024 and be used exclusively for the 2025 car.DGP123 wrote: ↑07 Feb 2023, 12:27As Seidl said last year, McLaren are a couple of years off. He’s now left, which says everything you need to know. If there was something exciting to stick around for, he’d still be there. Zak stated the team would not see the benefit of the new wind tunnel until 2025 either.
Unfortunately, I can’t see McLaren making any real progress this year. The top 3 are miles ahead.
During the launch, Zak mentioned that the Wind Tunnel will be ready by mid “2023”, but it won’t be used for the 2023 car (MCL60) but for the development of the 2024 car since by mid season they will already be working on next year’s car.AR3-GP wrote: ↑16 Feb 2023, 20:54Zak (or was it Stella?) said recently that new windtunnel will be online mid-2024 and be used exclusively for the 2025 car.DGP123 wrote: ↑07 Feb 2023, 12:27As Seidl said last year, McLaren are a couple of years off. He’s now left, which says everything you need to know. If there was something exciting to stick around for, he’d still be there. Zak stated the team would not see the benefit of the new wind tunnel until 2025 either.
Unfortunately, I can’t see McLaren making any real progress this year. The top 3 are miles ahead.