He did say he ran a lower seat this weekend.theformula wrote:Take a look at this guys:
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/blog ... -hamilton/
Reasonable theory? But do you think Lewis has sorted it out now, because silverstone qualy was like the old hamilton came back? And in the race, we saw an onboard of him behind di resta, and into turn 3 lewis was reallyy late on the brakes. has he got his confidence back do you reckon?
Good points by Fox. But please do explain how the width is causing the tyre wear? The Lotus tire wear is minimal in comparison and their diffuser exits 90 degrees out.n smikle wrote:I am not sure about the high speed stability but I think the width of their diffuser is the main cause of their tyre wear issues.FoxHound wrote:The car being unsettled at high speed turn in is a flaw Mercedes have had since the banning of the DDD.
Rosberg may be spot on in his assessment this cars diffuser is the problem.
Looking at earlier pictures of the cars diffuser, it also seems apparent that it remains largely untouched from testing spec.
Easy to say focus on the diffuser. Maybe it works wonderfully, but something ahead maybe distorting the picture.
Where does it say that he ran with a lower seat?Owen.C93 wrote:He did say he ran a lower seat this weekend.theformula wrote:Take a look at this guys:
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/blog ... -hamilton/
Reasonable theory? But do you think Lewis has sorted it out now, because silverstone qualy was like the old hamilton came back? And in the race, we saw an onboard of him behind di resta, and into turn 3 lewis was reallyy late on the brakes. has he got his confidence back do you reckon?
Perhaps it has something to do with chassis length. Is it inconceivable that they changed the length? Such things were done by McLaren in the past. They used to have a special chassis for Monaco. Why not have a different one for Lewis if he needs high speed stability.theformula wrote:Take a look at this guys:
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/blog ... -hamilton/
Reasonable theory? But do you think Lewis has sorted it out now, because silverstone qualy was like the old hamilton came back? And in the race, we saw an onboard of him behind di resta, and into turn 3 lewis was reallyy late on the brakes. has he got his confidence back do you reckon?
WhiteBlue wrote:Perhaps it has something to do with chassis length. Is it inconceivable that they changed the length? Such things were done by McLaren in the past. They used to have a special chassis for Monaco. Why not have a different one for Lewis if he needs high speed stability.theformula wrote:Take a look at this guys:
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/blog ... -hamilton/
Reasonable theory? But do you think Lewis has sorted it out now, because silverstone qualy was like the old hamilton came back? And in the race, we saw an onboard of him behind di resta, and into turn 3 lewis was reallyy late on the brakes. has he got his confidence back do you reckon?
Lol this is an old comment from page 4. There's loads of themNando wrote:So no criticism of the Mercedes, i get it.stefan_ wrote:That was not the point. The point was that continuing this "let's mock the W04" attitude is not constructive and it drags other people into making the same.
I´m sure this is a red bull killer.
The heat of the exhaust affecting the tyres. Notice Mercedes made a modification to their diffuser for Silverstone.. they put some extra vanes near the diffuser edges.dren wrote:Good points by Fox. But please do explain how the width is causing the tyre wear? The Lotus tire wear is minimal in comparison and their diffuser exits 90 degrees out.n smikle wrote:I am not sure about the high speed stability but I think the width of their diffuser is the main cause of their tyre wear issues.FoxHound wrote:The car being unsettled at high speed turn in is a flaw Mercedes have had since the banning of the DDD.
Rosberg may be spot on in his assessment this cars diffuser is the problem.
Looking at earlier pictures of the cars diffuser, it also seems apparent that it remains largely untouched from testing spec.
Easy to say focus on the diffuser. Maybe it works wonderfully, but something ahead maybe distorting the picture.
Thank you for that!diego.liv wrote:blogf1.it is really accurate, if you can read italian or the translator is good enough, here's the change in the rear suspension, pick up point brought back
Before https://imageshack.us/scaled/large/15/mer2dv.jpg
UK http://formula1.com/wi/enlarge/sutton/2 ... 9ju517.jpg
I think it's the FRIC. When you have an hydraulic system that somehow prevents diving under breaking making the front suspension stiffer it's probably harder to "feel" the brake.SectorOne wrote:...or it's simply the brakes as he says. People have a tendency to complicate things.
I'd make a guess and say that his mclarens have been stiffer in the front end..poz wrote:I think it's the FRIC. When you have an hydraulic system that somehow prevents diving under breaking making the front suspension stiffer it's probably harder to "feel" the brake.SectorOne wrote:...or it's simply the brakes as he says. People have a tendency to complicate things.