Honda is tolerating Boulier for now because they know the PU is not the best on the grid.kasio wrote:"Boulier Bouls*it."GoranF1 wrote:Suzuka is a great racetrack"
"but the truth is that our car is ill-suited to its long straights and mid- to high-speed corners." EB
Honda pays their bills...so I doubt that anyone at McLaren has the aim to mess with Honda.Sayeman wrote:Is there a chance of Mclaren intentionally messing with the car just to humiliate Honda at their home a bit more hoping to spur them on to improve even more?
Correct, but I just want to focus more on the positives instead of the negatives and hope for the best in the futureVasconia wrote:True, both are mediocre. Perhaps they will be good in 2017 but I am afraid that the improvement wont be enough to fight for the victories.bauc wrote:So there we have it, both chassis & PU are not up to the task.... well lets focus on the race tomorrow and on 2017 [-o<GoranF1 wrote:Suzuka is a great racetrack"
"but the truth is that our car is ill-suited to its long straights and mid- to high-speed corners." EB
Finally someone with clear mind and a solid measure of objectivity.Alonso Fan wrote:Where have Haas been all season? Them being in q3 with both cars shows how representative of form this track is. Last year Williams outqualified Ferrari and redbull at this track. This track throws up odd results now and again. Everyone up in arms for one bad showing. The last few races have shown us where McLaren are. Last year they were in the same positions in japan, yet looking mighty racy in Austin. Let's hope the same thing happens this year, just without the over optimism and pessimism
Every time McLaren do bad 'we told you so!! Chassis is real bad!! Engine is even worse!!!'
Every time they do good 'chassis is the fastest!!!! Engine is improving!!!'
Truth is, engine is some way behind Renault. Chassis is at best 4th fastest, at worst 6th fastest with tyre issues which make it even slower
Unlike what most say Suzuka is a very much Power circuit. This is why Ferrari is in front RB and this is why Haas is infront of Mclaren(that doesnt justify Mclaren chassis problem).Alonso Fan wrote:Where have Haas been all season? Them being in q3 with both cars shows how representative of form this track is. Last year Williams outqualified Ferrari and redbull at this track. This track throws up odd results now and again. Everyone up in arms for one bad showing. The last few races have shown us where McLaren are. Last year they were in the same positions in japan, yet looking mighty racy in Austin. Let's hope the same thing happens this year, just without the over optimism and pessimism
Every time McLaren do bad 'we told you so!! Chassis is real bad!! Engine is even worse!!!'
Every time they do good 'chassis is the fastest!!!! Engine is improving!!!'
Truth is, engine is some way behind Renault. Chassis is at best 4th fastest, at worst 6th fastest with tyre issues which make it even slower
GoranF1 wrote:Unlike what most say Suzuka is a very much Power circuit. This is why Ferrari is in front RB and this is why Haas is infront of Mclaren(that doesnt justify Mclaren chassis problem).Alonso Fan wrote:Where have Haas been all season? Them being in q3 with both cars shows how representative of form this track is. Last year Williams outqualified Ferrari and redbull at this track. This track throws up odd results now and again. Everyone up in arms for one bad showing. The last few races have shown us where McLaren are. Last year they were in the same positions in japan, yet looking mighty racy in Austin. Let's hope the same thing happens this year, just without the over optimism and pessimism
Every time McLaren do bad 'we told you so!! Chassis is real bad!! Engine is even worse!!!'
Every time they do good 'chassis is the fastest!!!! Engine is improving!!!'
Truth is, engine is some way behind Renault. Chassis is at best 4th fastest, at worst 6th fastest with tyre issues which make it even slower
Anyway here is how Mclaren compares to the Merc.
https://twitter.com/G3OF1/status/784776617239478273
Thanks. It's best to look at the season as a whole then over react at a bad weekendproteus wrote:Finally someone with clear mind and a solid measure of objectivity.Alonso Fan wrote:Where have Haas been all season? Them being in q3 with both cars shows how representative of form this track is. Last year Williams outqualified Ferrari and redbull at this track. This track throws up odd results now and again. Everyone up in arms for one bad showing. The last few races have shown us where McLaren are. Last year they were in the same positions in japan, yet looking mighty racy in Austin. Let's hope the same thing happens this year, just without the over optimism and pessimism
Every time McLaren do bad 'we told you so!! Chassis is real bad!! Engine is even worse!!!'
Every time they do good 'chassis is the fastest!!!! Engine is improving!!!'
Truth is, engine is some way behind Renault. Chassis is at best 4th fastest, at worst 6th fastest with tyre issues which make it even slower
This is what I was talking about earlier. Over reaction at a bad weekend.dobbster71 wrote:So, does that mean that the 2016 Honda PU is worse than the 2015 Ferrari PU? Or is the Torro Rosso chassis superior to the McLaren chassis? Or both????
Before you cast the first stone remember that Ferari has out qualified RBR. does that mean yhey have a better chassis?Goran2812 wrote:and he should shout it... honda did epic work from last season, mclaren not so much... they've been telling tales all year long how the chassis is great bla bla, and then this happens... on hondas home gp... such a shame...
Ok I can do the same. Does Haas have a better chassis than Williams or is the Ferrari Pu better than the Merc Pu? Or both?dobbster71 wrote:Not an overreaction at all. I simply asked 3 questions. Thanks for your answer though.
FWIW - I don't think there's much between TR & McLaren in performance terms over the season so far.
U wrote youre comment like STR was 3 seconds faster in Suzuka, and that they have 100 points more than the Mclaren.dobbster71 wrote:So, does that mean that the 2016 Honda PU is worse than the 2015 Ferrari PU? Or is the Torro Rosso chassis superior to the McLaren chassis? Or both????