Better (and faster) than i expected, i expected another 90 degree slow corner, this seems more open.n_anirudh wrote:
http://www.singaporegp.sg/media/images/20130819-1.jpg
Laptimes should drop a bit.
Better (and faster) than i expected, i expected another 90 degree slow corner, this seems more open.n_anirudh wrote:
http://www.singaporegp.sg/media/images/20130819-1.jpg
In 2011 they were lapped despite the safety car half way trough the race. In 2012 they were 34s behind the winner despite safety car half way in as well. Fast? lol.Spacepace wrote:Mercedes will be the quickest car. They were even fast there in 2012 and 2011. That car loves low speed circuits.
Given that their average result in 2012 was more like a minute off the pace, yes, they were relatively fast at Singapore last year.Juzh wrote:In 2011 they were lapped despite the safety car half way trough the race. In 2012 they were 34s behind the winner despite safety car half way in as well. Fast? lol.Spacepace wrote:Mercedes will be the quickest car. They were even fast there in 2012 and 2011. That car loves low speed circuits.
it depends, a gearbox must be used for at least 5 consecutive events, Singapore is 13th so if the have run 7+5, or 6+6SamH123 wrote:It seems like there is a small chance Red Bull might incur a gearbox penalty for Singapore?
What are the rules for changing them? I always forget how it works..
That's what I was getting at. As far as I remember Schumacher was having a good race up until he crashed. Another thing to note is after spa Lewis said that they will have a strong car in Singapore. He kind of knew they weren't going to win in Italy.beelsebob wrote:Given that their average result in 2012 was more like a minute off the pace, yes, they were relatively fast at Singapore last year.Juzh wrote:In 2011 they were lapped despite the safety car half way trough the race. In 2012 they were 34s behind the winner despite safety car half way in as well. Fast? lol.Spacepace wrote:Mercedes will be the quickest car. They were even fast there in 2012 and 2011. That car loves low speed circuits.
That said, I don't think last year's car has any real relevance. This year's car has performed very well at high downforce circuits, I'm fairly confident because of that that we'll see a HAM/ROS front row.
Does anyone have the updated information about the number of engine and gearbox used for each driver?langwadt wrote:it depends, a gearbox must be used for at least 5 consecutive events, Singapore is 13th so if the have run 7+5, or 6+6SamH123 wrote:It seems like there is a small chance Red Bull might incur a gearbox penalty for Singapore?
What are the rules for changing them? I always forget how it works..
I think they can change with no penalty, though I would assume they have run 5+5+2 so they can't
but they can change some bits inside the gearbox before P2 at each event so I guess it depends on how bad it is
You forget - they changed Seb's after Silverstone, probably. So it's done Germany, Hungary, Spa and Monza. This *should* be the 5th race for that box for Seb.langwadt wrote:it depends, a gearbox must be used for at least 5 consecutive events, Singapore is 13th so if the have run 7+5, or 6+6SamH123 wrote:It seems like there is a small chance Red Bull might incur a gearbox penalty for Singapore?
What are the rules for changing them? I always forget how it works..
I think they can change with no penalty, though I would assume they have run 5+5+2 so they can't
but they can change some bits inside the gearbox before P2 at each event so I guess it depends on how bad it is
your right, Monza was its 4th race - Ted confirmed this during the raceraymondu999 wrote: So it's done Germany, Hungary, Spa and Monza. This *should* be the 5th race for that box for Seb.