they did.FW17 wrote:The tyres did not change from last year.
slightly actually: the new thin "warning" layer under the main one. so, we cannot exclude an overall (though small) change in heat accumulation and dissipation behavior.
they did.FW17 wrote:The tyres did not change from last year.
Yes that is correct.digitalrurouni wrote:This could be considered potentially off topic but I read something that Lewis Hamilton said when asked about his starts. Apparently there was a rule change and he mentioned that now there is only 1 clutch instead of the usual 2 that gets used for launching a car? Is that correct?
No excuses whatsoever from me... just sometimes need to bring some merc fans closer to reality : )GPR-A wrote:So do you mean to say, having run 100s of miles on those tyres, lap after lap and collecting the data, wouldn't have helped them understand the behavior of that compound, more than others have?giantfan10 wrote: So they needed mediums to run the amount of miles they wanted to and it had nothing to do with the speculation started by the Sky sports chearleading division of mercedes that mercedes were running that tire to gain an advantage from knowing all they could about that tire.....
Anyways, time will tell the answer about whether W07 has any advantages on Mediums, compared to the competition or not. Starting with Bahrain, a track that puts enormous energy into the tyres being a power circuit. Ferrari having chosen 3 sets, would definitely seems to be using it for the race. So that will provide a picture.
I will be curious to hear next set of excuses and, see the LIGHTENING starts of Ferraris, which will be useless on this circuit if they do not have enough in them to keep the Mercedes' behind.
I still would not rule it out. Obviously Paddy will never admit that part, but a few folks, including me, think it is indeed the case.giantfan10 wrote: So they needed mediums to run the amount of miles they wanted to and it had nothing to do with the speculation started by the Sky sports chearleading division of mercedes that mercedes were running that tire to gain an advantage from knowing all they could about that tire.....
on a more interesting note Horner from Red bull thinks that Ferrari's lightning start was more about Ferrari and had nothing to do with Mercedes starting slow.
Sebastian Vettel and Kimi Raikkonen's stunning getaway from the lights at the Australian Grand Prix may not be a mere fluke.Red Bull boss Horner suggests the emphasis on the disparate getaways may be more towards Ferrari, revealing that he had spotted it was producing rapid starts in pre-season testing.
“Ferrari ran a lot closer to Mercedes,” he said when asked if he felt Ferrari had a chance against Mercedes this year. “
Yes the clutches are all multi plates.. but the controls were two paddles, that had two stages of maximum "clutch bite" that the driver selects in sequence to get a nice soft launch that wont impart too much wheels spin. First stage has a softer bite and the second stage has a hard bite.santos wrote:Double clutch? Don't they use a clutch with multi plates in F1 cars?
I don't think so, it was a missed opportunity by Ferrari, maybe not for a win but some pressure, one of the best tracks last season on pacedans79 wrote:Didn't Merc have tire wear trouble hear last year?SiLo wrote:Interesting to see how close Ferrari are here, last year they kept pace fairly well.
The fact that there's only one clutch paddle now is due to further limitations imposed by the FIA to make starts more "manual".mbchc wrote:As far as I recall from Lewis Hamilton last year in his steering wheel explained video. There are two clutch paddles on his wheel. When pressing both, 100% clutch engaged and releasing one of them with reduce to 50%
If there is only one clutch paddle this year, which may indicate the computer have a little more control to the launch?