carbon negative fuel produced by bacteria from leftovers, of if you want to call it that way, "renewable petrol"
http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/19128/
can you imagine sniffing the ethanol fumes out of that one? F1 would be a lot happier after a few lapsPNSD wrote:A 3.5 litre Ferrari V12 !
A few US Navy nuclear carriers provided this to places after the tsunami a few years back. Nuclear is the way to go for power production used in homes and businesses and fear-mongering, twisting of facts, and plain lies have stopped possibly the greatest and cleanest power source man has ever known.flynfrog wrote:Low cost clean water for third world countires
Low cost Clean power for ()
True. Just have to find a nice third world country where to dump all the radioactive waste afterwards.Ray wrote: A few US Navy nuclear carriers provided this to places after the tsunami a few years back. Nuclear is the way to go for power production used in homes and businesses and fear-mongering, twisting of facts, and plain lies have stopped possibly the greatest and cleanest power source man has ever known.
You can afford AC? Capitalist swine! (j/k)tarzoon wrote:my AC doesn't cool down enough in these hot temperatures.
I'd settle for changing the way we have these debates. It took close to 15 years to get some consensus on climate change in this country and in the meantime Peak Oil's really become the bigger issue IMO (if it wasn't always the bigger issue). I guess the lobbyists finally decided they'd held up human progress enough.tarzoon wrote:There's a lot that can be designed, but the most important thing is to change mentalities and start being sensible about what can be done everyday.
UK is planning the same thing for their new power plants. The small difference is that the CO2 will be buried in monstruous natural caves below the ocean/sea.jon-mullen wrote: Speaking of the NYT, this was actually on the front page yesterday, an article about burying CO2 in the ground. I seem to remember a story in my chem book about over 1000 people dying when underground CO2 was liberated from a swamp near them, but hey, it might work.
I think you're confusing the meat production CO2 with methane production in relation to greenhouse gassestarzoon wrote: Still, I think these are pennies. Intercontinental flights are more damaging that power plants (I don't remember seeing any exhaust pipe or catalytic converter in an aeroplane before). And cows, pigs and other animals grown for the meat produce A LOT of CO2 (I don't remember catalytic converters out of their asses either).
If the French could get their Super Phenix breeder-reactor up and running, it would be a giant leap for mankind IMO.Ray wrote:A few US Navy nuclear carriers provided this to places after the tsunami a few years back. Nuclear is the way to go for power production used in homes and businesses and fear-mongering, twisting of facts, and plain lies have stopped possibly the greatest and cleanest power source man has ever known.flynfrog wrote:Low cost clean water for third world countires
Low cost Clean power for ()
Sorry, you're right! Methane is over 20 times more damaging than CO2 to ozone.Michiba wrote: I think you're confusing the meat production CO2 with methane production in relation to greenhouse gasses
That's what happened with corn price because of greed fuel. There a few offices in London, NY and a bit around the globe that kept the corn price high with that excuse, for the sake of making personal profit. The excuse was that the extra money was going to the producer.Giblet wrote:I don't know too much about ethanol, but getting our food and energy from the same source seems like a bad idea.
A bottle of coke uses three times its content in water, and where Coca-Cola company lays down a factory, the populations are affected. There was a dispatches episode with Mark Thomas where he reveals some of this stuff:Giblet wrote:Companies like Coke should get involved, since it is already basically their job to feed us as much High Fruitcose Corn Syrup (HFCS) as possible. Pepsi sells "Vitamin Water" now which a lot of people drink. Guess what, it has more HFCS than Pepsi proper. Yuck.