Sorry I didn't take it as sarcasm, that is why I said I was confused.Manoah2u wrote:don't you recognise sarcasm when i respond to some shortsighted comment of another member? You can't just cut and copy-paste some line out of it's context.bdr529 wrote:Manoah2u wrote: I could do with an orange mclaren during the rests of the tests just to see how good that is, and then they can go red-white during the season. [-o<I must say you really confuse meManoah2u wrote: Red-White offcourse can only be Marlboro colours so nobody should ever be allowed to run that, no matter how far off it is.
here is the original discussion to clear things up
see the emoticon on the far end?Manoah2u wrote:guess what they did now, then. total West-tobacco livery.sulman wrote: They can't go back to a livery that has connotations with tobacco. It's commercial suicide.
and what does Ferrari do? No hint of Marlboro, right?
Lotus? No hint to a JPS tobacco livery, huh?
Red-White offcourse can only be Marlboro colours so nobody should ever be allowed to run that, no matter how far off it is.![]()
understand sarcasm?
Where did i here state Mclaren can't run red-white? Was that me or was that sulman?
thanks for clearing that up
PS. I'm a level headed guy, I could do with out the condescending remark at the end of your post