Any onboards already floating around, apart from that: https://vid.me/2R48
Looks like the left vertical bar on the display shows the ERS-level (?)
I think Hamilton tried to uncercut Rosberg while Rosberg tried to check brake Hamilton. Hamilton stated that he didn't see Bottas because he was in his blind spot. And I can imagine that he didn't expect somebody there, such an amazing start did Bottas have.A-Bap wrote:Watch the on-boards and aeriels. Bottas was quite true-to-line. Hamilton jinked his car to the inside--almost a quarter-turn of the wheel at the apex.foxmulder_ms wrote:
https://youtu.be/7nAFYbxT_sE?t=93
Well spotted. It looks like the deployment is done quite rapidly at the start of a straight, as you'd expect, but then at an much lower rate further down the straight.lio007 wrote:Any onboards already floating around, apart from that: https://vid.me/2R48
Looks like the left vertical bar on the display shows the ERS-level (?)
the left vertical bar on the display is speed not ERs. the numbers on the outside are KMHME4ME wrote:Well spotted. It looks like the deployment is done quite rapidly at the start of a straight, as you'd expect, but then at an much lower rate further down the straight.lio007 wrote:Any onboards already floating around, apart from that: https://vid.me/2R48
Looks like the left vertical bar on the display shows the ERS-level (?)
Channel 4 in Uk were showing ERS display on their onboard views if I recall well, I try to get some footagegiantfan10 wrote:the left vertical bar on the display is speed not ERs. the numbers on the outside are KMHME4ME wrote:Well spotted. It looks like the deployment is done quite rapidly at the start of a straight, as you'd expect, but then at an much lower rate further down the straight.lio007 wrote:Any onboards already floating around, apart from that: https://vid.me/2R48
Looks like the left vertical bar on the display shows the ERS-level (?)
"Rosberg tried to check brake Hamilton"?? Inside (tighter) line and clearly in front before the corner, how the hell can you invent brake-checking here? Hamilton didn't try to undercut anyone, just stay close behind and he saw Bottas just fine, you see objects next to you unless you've got no peripheral visionEdax wrote:I think Hamilton tried to uncercut Rosberg while Rosberg tried to check brake Hamilton. Hamilton stated that he didn't see Bottas because he was in his blind spot. And I can imagine that he didn't expect somebody there, such an amazing start did Bottas have.
To me it seems like a racing accident and I'm not sure it should have been penalized. Maybe Bottas was a bit overenthousiastic, but it is not like he dive bombed Hamilton. Anyway Hamilton doesn't seem to be to fazed about it. I think he drove a good race considering the damage. .
nice!!! i didnt get that version here,Redragon wrote:Channel 4 in Uk were showing ERS display on their onboard views if I recall well, I try to get some footagegiantfan10 wrote:the left vertical bar on the display is speed not ERs. the numbers on the outside are KMHME4ME wrote:
Well spotted. It looks like the deployment is done quite rapidly at the start of a straight, as you'd expect, but then at an much lower rate further down the straight.
The telemetry and Bottas' on-board showed that he drove into a dissappearing gap. That is not how you outmuscle a car into the corner. You can't just dive down and hope that the other guy backs out when he doesn't even see you in the first place. Ameteur driving. The same thing he did to Kimi in Russia and Mexico.iotar__ wrote:"Rosberg tried to check brake Hamilton"?? Inside (tighter) line and clearly in front before the corner, how the hell can you invent brake-checking here? Hamilton didn't try to undercut anyone, just stay close behind and he saw Bottas just fine, you see objects next to you unless you've got no peripheral visionEdax wrote:I think Hamilton tried to uncercut Rosberg while Rosberg tried to check brake Hamilton. Hamilton stated that he didn't see Bottas because he was in his blind spot. And I can imagine that he didn't expect somebody there, such an amazing start did Bottas have.
To me it seems like a racing accident and I'm not sure it should have been penalized. Maybe Bottas was a bit overenthousiastic, but it is not like he dive bombed Hamilton. Anyway Hamilton doesn't seem to be to fazed about it. I think he drove a good race considering the damage. .
Penalty is wrong in light of previous decisions but what do you expect from Whiting - Warwick combo? Bottas "had the right to be there" just like Ricciardo in Mexico as F1 expert Brundle said at the time and of course didn't now. Hamilton could have taken a wider line just like Vettel.
I consider both attempts (Ricciardo & Bottas) bad, too late and with collision in mind, gap on the inside doesn't justify a dive when there's no way of getting cleanly in front considering corner speed difference and the angle, side by side for split second is not 50/50. The problem is consistency and allowing driving like that earlier.
Though I wholeheartedly agree with you on the Mexico and Bahrain incidents, Kimi did really try to go for a gap that wasn't going to be there in Russia. But Bottas really needs to step up his consistency if he wants to drive for top tier teams.PlatinumZealot wrote:The telemetry and Bottas' on-board showed that he drove into a dissappearing gap. That is not how you outmuscle a car into the corner. You can't just dive down and hope that the other guy backs out when he doesn't even see you in the first place. Ameteur driving. The same thing he did to Kimi in Russia and Mexico.iotar__ wrote:"Rosberg tried to check brake Hamilton"?? Inside (tighter) line and clearly in front before the corner, how the hell can you invent brake-checking here? Hamilton didn't try to undercut anyone, just stay close behind and he saw Bottas just fine, you see objects next to you unless you've got no peripheral visionEdax wrote:I think Hamilton tried to uncercut Rosberg while Rosberg tried to check brake Hamilton. Hamilton stated that he didn't see Bottas because he was in his blind spot. And I can imagine that he didn't expect somebody there, such an amazing start did Bottas have.
To me it seems like a racing accident and I'm not sure it should have been penalized. Maybe Bottas was a bit overenthousiastic, but it is not like he dive bombed Hamilton. Anyway Hamilton doesn't seem to be to fazed about it. I think he drove a good race considering the damage. .
Penalty is wrong in light of previous decisions but what do you expect from Whiting - Warwick combo? Bottas "had the right to be there" just like Ricciardo in Mexico as F1 expert Brundle said at the time and of course didn't now. Hamilton could have taken a wider line just like Vettel.
I consider both attempts (Ricciardo & Bottas) bad, too late and with collision in mind, gap on the inside doesn't justify a dive when there's no way of getting cleanly in front considering corner speed difference and the angle, side by side for split second is not 50/50. The problem is consistency and allowing driving like that earlier.
Don't know wether brake-checking is the right word (non-native english). But that is what you do when you do when you are in front and have the cornered covered. Just slow down enough to take the momentum out of the other car and make sure that you determine the point where he can go on the throttle. Reaction time gives you an automatic advantage. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with it.iotar__ wrote:"Rosberg tried to check brake Hamilton"?? Inside (tighter) line and clearly in front before the corner, how the hell can you invent brake-checking here? Hamilton didn't try to undercut anyone, just stay close behind and he saw Bottas just fine, you see objects next to you unless you've got no peripheral visionEdax wrote: .
The stewards agree with you with the penalty. But it seems the stewards are not consistent at all. I have seen so many similar moves go unpunished. The stewards need alot more consistency.PlatinumZealot wrote:The telemetry and Bottas' on-board showed that he drove into a dissappearing gap. That is not how you outmuscle a car into the corner. You can't just dive down and hope that the other guy backs out when he doesn't even see you in the first place. Ameteur driving. The same thing he did to Kimi in Russia and Mexico.iotar__ wrote:"Rosberg tried to check brake Hamilton"?? Inside (tighter) line and clearly in front before the corner, how the hell can you invent brake-checking here? Hamilton didn't try to undercut anyone, just stay close behind and he saw Bottas just fine, you see objects next to you unless you've got no peripheral visionEdax wrote:I think Hamilton tried to uncercut Rosberg while Rosberg tried to check brake Hamilton. Hamilton stated that he didn't see Bottas because he was in his blind spot. And I can imagine that he didn't expect somebody there, such an amazing start did Bottas have.
To me it seems like a racing accident and I'm not sure it should have been penalized. Maybe Bottas was a bit overenthousiastic, but it is not like he dive bombed Hamilton. Anyway Hamilton doesn't seem to be to fazed about it. I think he drove a good race considering the damage. .
Penalty is wrong in light of previous decisions but what do you expect from Whiting - Warwick combo? Bottas "had the right to be there" just like Ricciardo in Mexico as F1 expert Brundle said at the time and of course didn't now. Hamilton could have taken a wider line just like Vettel.
I consider both attempts (Ricciardo & Bottas) bad, too late and with collision in mind, gap on the inside doesn't justify a dive when there's no way of getting cleanly in front considering corner speed difference and the angle, side by side for split second is not 50/50. The problem is consistency and allowing driving like that earlier.
Well, for starters, Malaysia 2015 was won on strategy.dans79 wrote:And imo strategy, is not Ferrari's strong point. The last Ferrari strategy master stroke I can think of was Spain 2013.f1316 wrote: Which is a long-winded way of saying that I think the gap is small enough that strategy alone could be enough to win some races.
Well, I hope that Ferrari will fix those problems which should be soon, unless these reliabilty problems are linked to the package, if its the case they will be in trouble.Andres125sx wrote:How do you evaluate difference?
Past season pace difference between Mercedes and Ferrari was bigger, but reliability was better for Ferrari.
This season pace difference is smaller, but Ferrari reliability has dropped off with two retirements in first two races.
Mercedes and Ferrari will be at least double than past season. To
With this average, final standing difference this season between me that´s far from reducing the difference.