2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
waynes
waynes
1
Joined: 23 Aug 2006, 23:23
Location: Manchester

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

Restomaniac wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 12:35
Turn 1 renamed to the ‘Niki Lauda Kurve’.
nice touch. I think the circuit should have been renamed the Lauda-ring, however i am aware that couldnt happen with its owners

:)

izzy
izzy
41
Joined: 26 May 2019, 22:28

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

Somebody on Sky, Brundle or PdR, said some cars have 30 radiators!! There's a whole secret world of layout in these cars isn't there, and Toto said Ferrari have basically done a better job of it, for cooling, hopefully it's not decisive today

djones
djones
20
Joined: 17 Mar 2005, 15:01

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

izzy wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 12:38
Somebody on Sky, Brundle or PdR, said some cars have 30 radiators!! There's a whole secret world of layout in these cars isn't there, and Toto said Ferrari have basically done a better job of it, for cooling, hopefully it's not decisive today
If this is true (probably is) then Honda/Redbull have also done a really good job of cooling.

I suspect a really bad race for Mercedes today. Which will probably do them good, just in case they had any feelings of invincibility.

waynes
waynes
1
Joined: 23 Aug 2006, 23:23
Location: Manchester

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

izzy wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 12:38
Somebody on Sky, Brundle or PdR, said some cars have 30 radiators!! There's a whole secret world of layout in these cars isn't there, and Toto said Ferrari have basically done a better job of it, for cooling, hopefully it's not decisive today
i heard that was well and remembered the days when there were three radiators :D

komninosm
komninosm
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2009, 18:41
Location: Macedonia

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

LM10 wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 16:03
Let’s see, if Hamilton will get his deserved penalty. My assumption is no.
hahaha
Midi wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 16:04
A penalty for a Mercedes driver? You must be joking ;)
hahaha

netoperek
netoperek
12
Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 23:06

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

George Russel will be starting from pit lane after changing front wing to different spec

User avatar
HPD
198
Joined: 30 Jun 2016, 16:06

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

Image

komninosm
komninosm
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2009, 18:41
Location: Macedonia

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

sosic2121 wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 19:16
Morteza wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 17:56
The best strategies according to Pirelli
https://i.imgur.com/PUtvOR6.jpg
wow
yet another super exciting 1-stop from pirelli. I wonder for how long is this 1-stop perfection is going to last :?
It will last until they bring refueling back, or change the pits road layout so that they lose less time going in and out.

komninosm
komninosm
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2009, 18:41
Location: Macedonia

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

roon wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 19:35
Just_a_fan wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 19:04
LM10 wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 19:00


What does other driver's (in this case Vettel) behaviour have anything to do with the current problem? Such posts are only aimed to provoke.
Strange, after Canada there was lots of using other drivers' (or rather one driver, mostly) actions in previous situations to argue about the then current problem.

Goose, sauce, gander. :wink:
You would advocate to not do what you're doing now? Contradictions, indeed. Duck, dressing, drake. 🐧
There's no contradiction there logically.
LM10 is saying we shouldn't now use other similar incidents/drivers.
Just_a_fan says that LM10 and others were singing a different tune less than a month ago. He does not say that they should not have done so then explicitly. Ergo no contradiction.
On the other hand what Ferrari fans are doing (bringing examples then and not wanting examples now) is the obvious contradictory position.

spin1/2
spin1/2
1
Joined: 23 Mar 2013, 21:06

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

LM10 wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 12:12
NL_Fer wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 11:58
I doubt cooling problems prevent powerunit power for 1 lap. It must be the extra cooling vents in the bodywork compromising the aero.
But surely not 6 tenths.
Changes to bodywork interfering with aero, lower PU mode, inability to keep tyres in optimal window. All of them contribute to the time delta.

izzy
izzy
41
Joined: 26 May 2019, 22:28

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

waynes wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 12:47
izzy wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 12:38
Somebody on Sky, Brundle or PdR, said some cars have 30 radiators!! There's a whole secret world of layout in these cars isn't there, and Toto said Ferrari have basically done a better job of it, for cooling, hopefully it's not decisive today
i heard that was well and remembered the days when there were three radiators :D
It must be the best way but it's hard to imagine how, with all the tubing and connections and ducting they must need. What about 'central cooling'?? 😁

It is a bit over the top isn't it, surely FIA could reduce the minimum weight without compromising safety

pb6797
pb6797
1
Joined: 15 Sep 2018, 23:25

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

Maybe it depends on your definition of radiator. A heat sink could be considered a "radiator" so perhaps it isn't quite that extreme.

I think we had a discussion somewhere else about whether they could use the Meredith effect, but I forget the analysis.

avatar
avatar
3
Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 22:01

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

komninosm wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 13:13
It will last until they bring refueling back, or change the pits road layout so that they lose less time going in and out.
Good thought actually - since the pitlane speed limit was lowered years ago, how many of the circuits still have the same length entry/exit?

Combine that with no weight benefit from short stints and you're putting a lot of responsibility on the tires, to provide a performance differentiator on short stints that used to be better shared among fuel weight trade-off, fresh tyres and lower time-loss (higher speed limit meant less time lost for traversing the pitlane)...

Hence artificially requiring a stop & trying to get a performance differentiator by virtue of having to run 2 compounds...

I'd agree there needs to be a better balance between staying out and taking multiple stops - let's face it, right now (without the multi-compound rule) some tracks would be zero-stop races.

It'd be much better if zero stops were an option, but multi-stop was generally faster. Likely only an option with refuelling (tail-enders might then put a mega-size tank in and zero stop on hards, or go aggressive with a light tank and multiple stops).
Last edited by avatar on 30 Jun 2019, 13:59, edited 1 time in total.

komninosm
komninosm
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2009, 18:41
Location: Macedonia

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

avatar wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 13:34
komninosm wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 13:13
It will last until they bring refueling back, or change the pits road layout so that they lose less time going in and out.
Good thought actually - since the pitlane speed limit was lowered years ago, how many of the circuits still have the same length entry/exit?

Combine that with no weight benefit from short stints and you're putting at of responsibility on the tires, to provide a performance differentiator on short stints that used to be better shared among fuel weight trade, fresh this and lower time-loss (higher speed limit meant less time lost for traversing the pitlane)...

Hence artificially requiring a stop & trying to get a performance differentiator by virtue of having to run 2 compounds...

I'd agree there needs to be a better balance between staying out and taking multiple stops - let's face it, right now (without the multi-compound rule) some tracks would be zero-stop races.

It'd be much better if zero stops were an option, but multi-stop was generally faster. Likely only an option with refuelling (tail-enders might then put a mega-size tank in and zero stop on hards, or go aggressive with a light tank and multiple stops).
Exactly, bringing back refueling and/or shortening the pit entry and exit roads will make pit-stops a lot more desirable, and the lame abstract rule of having to use 2 different compounds unnecessary.
It will also probably increase safety because we've had a lot of instances of accidents with tires and stuff because of the 3 second pit stops.
More freedom, more options, better racing as you describe.

User avatar
TAG
20
Joined: 09 Dec 2014, 16:18
Location: in a good place

Re: 2019 [R09] Austrian Grand Prix, Spielberg, 28-30 June

Post

spin1/2 wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 08:24
TAG wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 04:15
spin1/2 wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 01:38
LH has more poles but fewer Ws compared to MSc.
14th. LH has a much higher W percentage than MS, give it 70 more races and we'll see where things wind up. Depending on what happens in the first couple of laps and where the temperature winds up, I think it's anyone's race from the top 4 spots.
MSc hurt his win percentage by returning for a second stint - it reduced from 36% down to 29%. LH only keeps increasing his win % during his Merc stint.
That's your opinion. The numbers are the numbers, not sure why you even brought it up other than for the intent to inflame. Don't worry if Hamilton doesn't win today his % will drop a little and you'll feel better.
माकडाच्या हाती कोलीत