nice touch. I think the circuit should have been renamed the Lauda-ring, however i am aware that couldnt happen with its owners
nice touch. I think the circuit should have been renamed the Lauda-ring, however i am aware that couldnt happen with its owners
If this is true (probably is) then Honda/Redbull have also done a really good job of cooling.
i heard that was well and remembered the days when there were three radiators
It will last until they bring refueling back, or change the pits road layout so that they lose less time going in and out.sosic2121 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2019, 19:16wowMorteza wrote: ↑29 Jun 2019, 17:56The best strategies according to Pirelli
https://i.imgur.com/PUtvOR6.jpg
yet another super exciting 1-stop from pirelli. I wonder for how long is this 1-stop perfection is going to last
There's no contradiction there logically.roon wrote: ↑29 Jun 2019, 19:35You would advocate to not do what you're doing now? Contradictions, indeed. Duck, dressing, drake.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑29 Jun 2019, 19:04Strange, after Canada there was lots of using other drivers' (or rather one driver, mostly) actions in previous situations to argue about the then current problem.
Goose, sauce, gander.
Changes to bodywork interfering with aero, lower PU mode, inability to keep tyres in optimal window. All of them contribute to the time delta.
It must be the best way but it's hard to imagine how, with all the tubing and connections and ducting they must need. What about 'central cooling'??
Good thought actually - since the pitlane speed limit was lowered years ago, how many of the circuits still have the same length entry/exit?
Exactly, bringing back refueling and/or shortening the pit entry and exit roads will make pit-stops a lot more desirable, and the lame abstract rule of having to use 2 different compounds unnecessary.avatar wrote: ↑30 Jun 2019, 13:34Good thought actually - since the pitlane speed limit was lowered years ago, how many of the circuits still have the same length entry/exit?
Combine that with no weight benefit from short stints and you're putting at of responsibility on the tires, to provide a performance differentiator on short stints that used to be better shared among fuel weight trade, fresh this and lower time-loss (higher speed limit meant less time lost for traversing the pitlane)...
Hence artificially requiring a stop & trying to get a performance differentiator by virtue of having to run 2 compounds...
I'd agree there needs to be a better balance between staying out and taking multiple stops - let's face it, right now (without the multi-compound rule) some tracks would be zero-stop races.
It'd be much better if zero stops were an option, but multi-stop was generally faster. Likely only an option with refuelling (tail-enders might then put a mega-size tank in and zero stop on hards, or go aggressive with a light tank and multiple stops).
That's your opinion. The numbers are the numbers, not sure why you even brought it up other than for the intent to inflame. Don't worry if Hamilton doesn't win today his % will drop a little and you'll feel better.spin1/2 wrote: ↑30 Jun 2019, 08:24MSc hurt his win percentage by returning for a second stint - it reduced from 36% down to 29%. LH only keeps increasing his win % during his Merc stint.