raymondu999 wrote:Lotus have 1 failure - Grosjean in Valencia. So 2 for Red Bull, 1 for Lotus.
Actually - the R30 Pirelli uses as test mule has had quite a fair share of failures. Have Renault been using that as an on-track dyno?gilgen wrote:raymondu999 wrote:Lotus have 1 failure - Grosjean in Valencia. So 2 for Red Bull, 1 for Lotus.
Red Bull have had FOUR failures. Two for Vettel in races, one in practice. And one for Webber in race.
Lotus have also had failures in testing, as have Caterham.
Yes, it sounds to me like the other cars that use Renault engines used the new spec alternators in Austin. No problems from them so RBR feel like its the best way to go.raymondu999 wrote:From the article, it sounds like basically they made modifications and fixes to the 2012-spec alternators (which, let's not forget - was reliable all the way from Melbourne to Valencia, and then Valencia to Monza) and they're fielding those. Not any special designs AFTER the failures.
Isn't it 3 for Red Bull now, Vettel=Valencia, Monza. Webber=USAraymondu999 wrote:Lotus have 1 failure - Grosjean in Valencia. So 2 for Red Bull, 1 for Lotus.
Thanks.Cam wrote:Interesting thought ziggy and well done for thinking of a completely new cause for the problems - and for supplying backup data to go with it. If I knew more about that stuff and could verify it's plausible I'd +1. Does anyone know if this is conceivable?
Ya, would be interesting to know their experience with the DRD from YDT. I wouldn't be surprised if they were the first (along with Sauber) to make it work properly.Joie de vivre wrote:It's interesting how they quickly adapt upgrades by others (ie. sauber exhaust). Deffo less time than Merc's coanda exhaust.
What does this have to do with the RB8?McMrocks wrote:fortunately the Brazilian track has not as much slow corners as the CotA