Red Bull RB7 Renault

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

Formula None wrote:Any idea what the small teardrop shaped fairings are for on the front wing's upper elements?
Good spot!
Maybe something to test front tyre temps?

RichardHH
RichardHH
0
Joined: 02 Feb 2011, 18:53

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

djos wrote:imo it's more likely that having a "super fast" mechanism disrupts the airflow too much and causes the airflow to detach when activated.
I can agree that a fast movement can disturb the airflow... but for how long? Surely reaching a smooth air flow will take a lot less time than the 0.1 to 0.3 seconds that I lose from using a slow actuator.

Robbobnob
Robbobnob
33
Joined: 21 May 2010, 04:03
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

Any idea what the small teardrop shaped fairings are for on the front wing's upper elements?
Looks like they would generate a Vortex infront of the break ducts
"I continuously go further and further learning about my own limitations, my body limitations, psychological limitations. It's a way of life for me." - Ayrton Senna

wesley123
wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

why would you want screwed up airflow(well it isnt quite screwed up but it isnt quite airflow you want to cool your car) into the brake ducts?

Such similair thing was done too with the Peugeot 908HDI FAP(The turbo intake behind the mirror in frontal view, only here airflow got time to go back to normal)
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

RichardHH wrote:
djos wrote:imo it's more likely that having a "super fast" mechanism disrupts the airflow too much and causes the airflow to detach when activated.
I can agree that a fast movement can disturb the airflow... but for how long? Surely reaching a smooth air flow will take a lot less time than the 0.1 to 0.3 seconds that I lose from using a slow actuator.
Exactly, stalling is the aim not increasing down-force so disruption is welcome.
What redbull may be doing is having a different wing speed for qualifying than in the race. Seeing as though in qualifying the wing will be stalled in the exit of the turns, it may be of some benefit to have the stall a little slower so downforce is reduced gently as the car is in the process of exiting the turn.
During the race while overtaking in the straights is a different story, that wing may stall as fast and disruptive as mechanically possible.
For Sure!!

wrcsti
wrcsti
0
Joined: 06 Apr 2009, 04:46

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

Alll this wing speed talk and noone referencing to the huge hot air exit?

User avatar
Lindz
0
Joined: 09 Feb 2011, 11:01

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

wrcsti wrote:Alll this wing speed talk and noone referencing to the huge hot air exit?
What about it? It's been discussed to death already. And the latest Barca test saw them running the smaller more teardrop shaped one.

Formula None wrote:Any idea what the small teardrop shaped fairings are for on the front wing's upper elements?

picture
I think if it were purely to create a vortex for the brake ducts, they could easily do that with the shape of the trailing edge, no? It looks to be adjustable, whatever it is.

Maybe it's not just for the brake ducts. Maybe it is more beneficial to have the air separate ahead of the tire. Instead of hitting the tire with a high pressure air flow, this could create a pocket of low pressure just ahead of the tire, reducing it's affect on drag and airflow to the sidepods...

You've already got low pressure flow from the bottom of the wing elements, you just need that little something to get some of the high pressure from the top element to drop right before the tire...

SoliRossi
SoliRossi
0
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 09:43

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

ringo wrote:
RichardHH wrote:
djos wrote:imo it's more likely that having a "super fast" mechanism disrupts the airflow too much and causes the airflow to detach when activated.
I can agree that a fast movement can disturb the airflow... but for how long? Surely reaching a smooth air flow will take a lot less time than the 0.1 to 0.3 seconds that I lose from using a slow actuator.
Exactly, stalling is the aim not increasing down-force so disruption is welcome.
What redbull may be doing is having a different wing speed for qualifying than in the race. Seeing as though in qualifying the wing will be stalled in the exit of the turns, it may be of some benefit to have the stall a little slower so downforce is reduced gently as the car is in the process of exiting the turn.
During the race while overtaking in the straights is a different story, that wing may stall as fast and disruptive as mechanically possible.

I like ringo's idea. Sounds like a logical and intuitive way to use the wing. Maximise it for each intended use, and lets face it when used in race and quali the goals are very different.

RichardHH
RichardHH
0
Joined: 02 Feb 2011, 18:53

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

SoliRossi wrote:
ringo wrote:
RichardHH wrote: I can agree that a fast movement can disturb the airflow... but for how long? Surely reaching a smooth air flow will take a lot less time than the 0.1 to 0.3 seconds that I lose from using a slow actuator.
Exactly, stalling is the aim not increasing down-force so disruption is welcome.
What redbull may be doing is having a different wing speed for qualifying than in the race. Seeing as though in qualifying the wing will be stalled in the exit of the turns, it may be of some benefit to have the stall a little slower so downforce is reduced gently as the car is in the process of exiting the turn.
During the race while overtaking in the straights is a different story, that wing may stall as fast and disruptive as mechanically possible.

I like ringo's idea. Sounds like a logical and intuitive way to use the wing. Maximise it for each intended use, and lets face it when used in race and quali the goals are very different.
Using a slower deployment sounds reasonable when opening up, especialy when activating it at a moment where I need good balance. Good thinking Ringo, I didn't considder that. Closing the system is IMHO a different story.

I would open it slowly when the car is in a turn, open and close it as fast as I could for the rest.

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

wrcsti wrote:Alll this wing speed talk and noone referencing to the huge hot air exit?
Actually I wonder if the two things are linked. One of the comments, think it may have been scarbs, on the Red Bull said that the size of the duct would disrupt airflow to the rear wing causing it to be less effective, but the trade off was that it would clean up the airflow for the top of the diffuser and beam wing. As the Red Bull rear wing is less effective than that on other cars in terms of overall percentage of downforce being generated, that could also help explain why they are able to activate the ARW earlier than the other cars.

AbbaleRacing77
AbbaleRacing77
0
Joined: 23 Mar 2010, 23:05

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

Aren't they only allowed to use the adjustable wing in designated sections of the track??? Making this whole conversation about red bull activating there wing early irrelevant?

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

They can use it freely in practice and qualifying. So if they want to use it in several places on the track in qualifying in order to get the best time then they can do so.

During the race, the wing will only work in the "designated area".
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

SoliRossi
SoliRossi
0
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 09:43

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

Spot on, think back to KERS, in a racing situation you would store it up for maximum boost compared to your oponent, but in quali or the quickest way around a lap was to use it on each acceleration zone.


The RWSD is similar its just that in the race its legislated to enforce where you can use it. However in quali you can use it as you see fit. So sheding downforce as soon as its not required is a massive advantage to overall lap time, especially if its as effective as they suggest.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

Don't forget that if there is nobody 1 second in front of you, you don't get to use the DRS!
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

rayden
rayden
2
Joined: 17 Mar 2010, 07:30

Re: Red Bull RB7 Renault

Post

n smikle wrote:Don't forget that if there is nobody 1 second in front of you, you don't get to use the DRS!
no, this is not true.

in the race itself yes, but you a free to use it whenever/wherever you wish in qualifying.