Daniel arrived at the circuit without his horse this time.
Schmidt from AmuS indicated the same in his COTA video review.
Wow, I forgot about that one! Thanks for the correction.organic wrote: ↑27 Oct 2022, 16:38There was a 1-2 in 2021... Mclaren at MonzaMadMax wrote: ↑27 Oct 2022, 16:14The reality is that 90% 1st and 2nd for a team just hasn't happened even back in the day with the mythical MP4/4 and F2004. In 2016 it happened for Mercedes in 8 out of 21 races. It was actually more likely in 2014 and 2015 (both 11 out of 19). In 2017 it was 4 out of 20, 2018 4 out of 21. 2019 was 9 out of 21 (a good Merc showing that year, obviously), 2020 was 5 out of 17. 2022 is currently at 2017 / 2018 levels with 4 of the races to date as a 1/2 for RBR.Sieper wrote: ↑27 Oct 2022, 15:11I haven't found it dull at all, nor predictable. Seen frontrunners having had their engine go up in smoke multiple times (happened just once in 2016 and look how impacting we all found that to be) see People start out of place on many occasions, many wet races. tight fights and yes, also dominant victories. Mostly by Max but also a few by Charles.
Maybe if a team gets their car on 1 and the other on 2 in 90% of the races (start and finishing order) it will be dull, but so far this season that hasn't been the case.
Interestingly, it didn't happen at all in 2021, although Max and Lewis were a 1st / 2nd combination 14 times out of 22 races. For fun, the four drivers with RBR and Mercedes finished 1,2,3,4 (in some combination) 4 times in 2021 (Portugal, France, Styrian and Brazil) with Max or Lewis P1 and P2 twice each - Sergio and Valterri didn't win in any of those four races although they took a win each that season.
A draggy car will lose more drag, as a figure in N, than a less draggy car if both lose the same percentage of their total drag.
What makes you sure it was never about drag? I don't believe that's correct
Agree with most of what you are saying, but Singapore was such a missed opportunity for Merc as they never got to show their true pace. Hamilton stuck behind Sainz, then the mistake, and he's stuck behind Vettel the whole race. I still think that if Ham had nailed the lap in quali and been on pole he would have won it.organic wrote: ↑27 Oct 2022, 17:20well rb have historically been very strong here with draggy but high downforce configuration.. Mercedes' performance in the corners at COTA against RB (who did admittedly run with the medium downforce wing for Max) was good.
It's also worth noting that at Barcelona, where they did run their Monaco wing and reached maximum velocity, RB's velocity traces were not anything special. It seems like that when RB go to their high downforce configuration, they lose the straightline advantage they hold in the medium and low load settings:
https://preview.redd.it/59yk24z8ou091.p ... 6458a40cb1
Credit for telemetry: dialtone
That said, seems like even in high downforce setups, RB have developed the RB18 to work well. We saw RB comfortably ahead of Mercedes and competitive with Ferrari at Singapore and Hungary with the high load wing. Throw in Mercedes' latest 3 tenths worth of upgrades and we have a very competitive w13 at high downforce tracks eg zandvoort, mexico (potentially)
Conclusion: I imagine it will be close with Mercedes this weekend, and not another walkaway win for RB
That was scheduled for today at 18:00 as far as I recall ?
I presume that is Mexican time? Instead of any other time zone?
I reckon ...chrisc90 wrote: ↑27 Oct 2022, 19:39I presume that is Mexican time? Instead of any other time zone?