Yeah, But he would still be infront of Button & Webber and just behind Vettel, so this isnt seen as a penalty, Lets send him to the back of the grid!
Bunch of P****s on the stewards panel and up at the FIA.
complete cock.
What's the performance penalty for carrying another litre or two of fuel? What does that half second actually equate to in fuel load? The usual quoted amount is 0.3 - 0.4 seconds for 10kg of fuel. So if they actually looked at the gap then they shouldn't have punished him.bhallg2k wrote:I think the stewards looked at Hamilton's half-second advantage over the rest of the drivers in Q3 and compared that to the fact that the top ten were separated by less than a second at the end of Q2 and concluded that Hamilton was purposefully underfueled to gain a performance advantage.
For trying make assholes from stewards by telling them that was an technical problem?simos wrote:I tried reading FIA explanation couple of times, but I still don't get it for what exactly the team was penalized.
For not coming back to pits?
For stopping a car on track?
For not having enough fuel onboard?
And another thing, how much fuel had Hamilston still onboard when he stopped? Did he have that 1l required for testing?
Are you sure? how much fuel does a slow inlap use up?Nando wrote:The only thing he got penalized for was not coming into the pits.
He had enough fuel for the test.
McLaren, in a nutshell."
The fuel rig guy put the rig on, but he had the handle set to drain fuel.
He discovered his mistake and switched it to put fuel in the car. But as a result he didn't put as much fuel in it as he should have.
You have to be able to drive back to the pit-lane and have one litre of fuel left for the FIA to test.
He went across the start-finish line 20 seconds before the chequered flag but if they had sat in the garage for three or four more seconds to get more fuel in, they still would have had time to cross the line and complete another flying lap. Sometimes I don't think McLaren think on their feet."